Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

VIVEKANANDHA COLLEGE OF

ENGINEERING FOR WOMEN


(AUTONOMOUS)

CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING


(NANO ELECTRONICS)
SUBMITTED BY
K.NANDHINI(18205003),
II-ME (VLSI DESIGN)
INTRODUCTION
CMP Basics:
CMP is a physico-chemical process used to make
wafer surfaces locally and globally flat.
Chemical action:
• Hydroxyl ions attack SiO2 in oxide CMP,
causing surface softening and chemical
dissolution.
• Oxidants enhance metal dissolution and control
passivation in metal CMP.
INTRODUCTION(cont.,)
Mechanical action:
• Polisher rotation and pressure.
• A rotating wafer is pressed face-down against a
rotating polishing pad; an aqueous suspension
of abrasive (slurry) is pressed against the face
of the wafer by the pad.
• A combination of chemical and physical effects
removes features from the wafer surface.
CMP Apparatus
What is CMP?

• Polishing of Layer to Remove a Specific Material,


e.g. Metal, dielectric.

• Planarization of IC Surface Topology.


CMP Tooling
• Rotating Multi-head Wafer Carriage.
• Rotating Pad.
• Wafer Rests on Film of Slurry.

Velocity= -(WtRcc)–[Rh(Wh –Wt)]

when Wh=Wt Velocity = const.


Table Quill (Wafer Carrier)
Schematic Diagram
Background
 Used to polish ‘bare wafer’.
 IBM pioneered.
 Uses particles. Class 100 or Class 1000 clean room.
 Pad
Soft pad, hard pad, stacked pad.
Hard pad with perforations, grooves.
 Quill
Surface tension, vacuum
 Slurry
Abrasive, chemicals
CMP: Pad
• Pad is softer than wafer
– whether it is Cu or oxide or W
• Pure chemical dissolution is rare
– A complexing or oxidizing film usually forms
• Pure mechanical removal is possible, but not
preferred
– Scratches
• ==> shorts
• Pad has asperities
– helps in holding particles
CMP: Consumable
 Pad can be used for 150 polishes (for example)
 Polish rate and within wafer non uniformity will go
worse (WIWNU)

PETEOS- Plasma
Enhanced TEOS
based oxide
CMP: Removal Rate
 Both pad and quill (wafer holder) rotating at the same
rate
 Quill off-center
 Relative velocity at all the locations will be same
Dishing Erosion Losses

Soft pad ==> more dishing erosion.

 Dishing/Erosion ==> higher resistance,


more variation in resistance.
CMP: Copper
 Single step vs. Multi step (cost of equipment,
slurry).
 Barrier CMP.
 Ta harder, less reactive.
 Traces of barrier – short.
 More mechanical removal – short scratches.
 More chemical removal - Cu loss.
 Need to strike a balance.
CMP: Oxide
 Blank Oxide vs STI
 LOCOS vs STI
 LOCOS: semi recessed/ fully recessed
 Issues:
 Dummy Fill / Reverse Active Mask
 Dishing
 Notch
 Stress
 Nitride Polish
CMP: Wafer
 Well established.
 Liner removal is easier (Ti/TiN).
 Lingering liner can be removed (for example)
with plasma etch / RIE.
 For a short time (touch up RIE).
 Good selectivity is achievable.
 Wafer plug is never large.
 Dishing not an issue.
 Erosion still an issue.
 not for resistance.
 however for DOF.
CMP: Clean
Particles to be removed.

 Brush Scrub
 Boundary Layer

 Mega Sonic/ ultra sonic.

 Copper sometimes
cleaned in dark.
CMP: New Nodes

 Abrasive Free, Fixed abrasive, Micelle.

 Electro polish.

You might also like