X. Agrarian Reform
X. Agrarian Reform
X. Agrarian Reform
Prepared by:
The uprising, which occurred in Central Luzon in May, 1935, claimed about
hundred lives
Rice Share Tenancy Act of 1933
• President Manuel L. Quezon implemented the Rice Share
Tenancy Act of 1933.
• Purpose: -To regulate the share-tenancy contracts by
establishing minimum standards.
-Primarily, the Act provided for better tenant-landlord
relationship,
-a 50–50 sharing of the crop,
-regulation of interest to 10% per agricultural year, and
-a safeguard against arbitrary dismissal by the landlord.
• The major flaw of this law was that it could be used only when
the majority of municipal councils in a province petitioned for it.
• Quezón ordered that the act be mandatory in all Central Luzon
provinces.However, contracts were good only for one year.
• In 1936, this Act was amended to get rid of its loophole, but the
landlords made its application relative and not absolute.
Consequently, it was never carried out in spite of its good
intentions. In fact, by 1939, thousands of peasants in Central
Luzon were being threatened with wholesale eviction.
• Republic Act No. 1946 likewise known as the Tenant Act which
provided for a 70–30 sharing arrangements and regulated share-
tenancy contracts. It was passed to resolve the ongoing peasant
unrest in Central Luzon.
• As part of his Agrarian Reform agenda, President Elpidio Quirino
issued on October 23, 1950 Executive Order No. 355 which
replaced the National Land Settlement Administration with Land
Settlement Development Corporation (LASEDECO) which takes
over the responsibilities of the Agricultural Machinery Equipment
Corporation and the Rice and Corn Production Administration.
• Republic Act No. 1400 (Land Reform Act of 1955) – Created the Land
Tenure Administration (LTA) which was responsible for the
acquisition and distribution of large tenanted rice and corn lands
over 200 hectares for individuals and 600 hectares for corporations.
• The law paved the way for the redistribution of agricultural lands
to tenant-farmers from landowners, who were paid in exchange
by the government through just compensation but were also
allowed to retain not more than five hectares of land.
• Despite the flaws in the law, the Supreme Court upheld its
constitutionality in 1989, declaring that the implementation of
the comprehensive agrarian reform program (CARP) provided by
the said law, was “a revolutionary kind of expropriation.”[
• Despite the implementation of CARP, Aquino was not spared
from the controversies that eventually centered on Hacienda
Luisita, a 6,453-hectare estate located in the Province of Tarlac,
which she, together with her siblings inherited from her father
Jose Cojuangco (Don Pepe).