NATURE AND

ROLE OF
ASSESSMENT
MEANING:

a process by which information

is obtained relative to some
known objective or goal
 the systematic basis for
making inferences about the
learning and development of
students
identify academic weaknesses and
strengths so that educators can
provide specialized academic
support, educational programming,
or social services to improve
educational programs.

systematic collection, review, and

use of information about educational
programs undertaken for the
purpose of improving student
learning and development
NATURE
embedded in the learning process
 tightly interconnected with curriculum
and instruction
involves students and teachers in
continuous monitoring of students’ learning

gives students a measure of their

progress as learners
helps in collection of frequent feedback
on students’ learning and how they respond
to particular teaching approaches
“Assessment” includes all those activities
undertaken by teachers, and by their
students in assessing themselves, which
provide information to be used as feedback
to modify the teaching and learning
activities in which they are engaged
ROLE
it plays a constant role in informing
instruction, guiding the students’ next
steps, and checking the progress and
achievements
Assessments’ role plays in supporting and
improving student learning; and the most
important part of it is the interpretation and use of
the information that is gleaned for its intended
purpose
 CONCEPTS OF ASSESSMENT
 The ultimate purpose of assessment for
learning is to create self-regulated learners
who can leave school able, and confident to
continue learning throughout their lives
 Teachers need to know the outset, where their
students are in terms of their learning and then
continually check on how they are progressing
through strengthening the feedback they get
from their learners
 We are continually faced with the challenge of
assessing the progress of our students as well as
our own effectiveness as teachers.
 MEASUREMENT
 is the quantification of what students have
learned through the use of tests,
questionnaires, rating scales, checklist and
other devices
 It answers the question; “how much does a
student learn or know”
ASSESSMENT
refers to the full range of information gathered
and synthesized by teachers about their students
and their classrooms
It looks into: “how much change has occurred on the
student’s acquisition of a skill, knowledge or value
before and after a given learning experience.”
EVALUATION
 is a process of making judgments,
assigning value or deciding on the
worth of students performance.
 It answers the question; “how good,
adequate or desirable is it”

EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT

 Knowledge of the subject matter: can

be measured through standardized test
results (the measurement procedure is
testing)
can be measured through perceptions: (ask a
group of experts to rate student’s/teacher’s
knowledge of the subject matter in a scale of 1
to 5)
TYPES OF MEASUREMENT
Objective (as in testing) more
stable than subjective measurements in the sense
that repeated measurements of the same
quantity or quality of interest will produce more
or less the same outcome
Subjective (as in perception)
some facets which cannot be captured by
objective procedures which can be done by
subjective methods
 EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT
 Assessment is a method of evaluating
personality in which an individual, living in a
group meets and solves a variety of lifelike
problems.

3 Principal Features of Assessment

 The use of a variety of techniques
 Reliance on observations
 Integration of information

Assessment focuses not only on the nature of the

learner but also on what to be learned and how
it is to be learned.
 RELEVANCE OF ASSESSMENT
 Assessment for learning: where
assessment helps teachers gain insight into what
students understand in order to plan and guide
instruction, and provide helpful feedback to
students.
 this includes three types of assessment done before
and during instruction. These are placement,
formative and diagnostic.
 Placement—done prior to instruction
Its purpose is to assess the needs of the learners to have basis in
planning for a relevant instruction
Teachers use this assessment to know what their students are
bringing into learning situation and use this as a starting point for
instruction.
The results of this assessment place students in specific learning
groups to facilitate teaching and learning
Formative—done during instruction
This assessment is where teachers continuously monitor the
students’ level of attainment of the learning objectives (Stiggins,
2005)
The results of this assessment are communicated clearly and
promptly to the students for them to know their strengths and
weaknesses and the progress of their learning.
Diagnostic – done during instruction
This is used to determine students’ recurring or persistent
difficulties
It searches for the underlying causes of students’ learning
problems that do not respond to first aid treatment
It helps formulate a plan for detailed remedial instruction
Assessment as learning: where students
develop an awareness of how they learn and use
that awareness to adjust and advance their
learning, taking an increased responsibility for
their learning.
this is done for teachers to understand and
perform well their role of assessing FOR and OF
learning.
It requires teachers to undergo training on how
to assess learning and be equipped with the
following competencies needed in performing
their work as assessors.
Assessment of learning: where assessment
informs students, teachers and parents, as well
as the broader educational community, of
achievement at a certain point in time in order to
celebrate success, plan interventions and support
continued progress.
this is done after instruction. This is usually
referred to as the summative assessment
 It is used to certify what students know and can do and the level
of their proficiency or competency
Its results reveal whether or not instructions have successfully
achieved the curriculum outcomes
The information form assessment of learning is usually expressed as
marks or letter grades
The results of which are communicated to the students, parents,
and other stakeholders for decision-making
It is also a powerful factor that could pave the way for educational
reforms
 RESEARCH AND EXPERIENCE SHOW THAT
STUDENT LEARNING IS BEST SUPPORTED WHEN;
 Instruction and assessment are based on clear
learning goals  Instruction and assessment are
differentiated according to student learning needs
 Students are involved in the learning process; (they
understand the learning goal and the criteria for
quality work, receive and use descriptive feedback,
and take steps to adjust their performance)
Assessment information is used to make
decisions that support further learning
 Parents are well informed about their child’s
learning, and work with the school to help plan and
provide support
Students, families, and the general public have
confidence in the system
The primary role of assessment is to enhance
teaching and improve student learning and
supports this through the respective agencies and
department.
Assessment is a key component of learning
because it helps students learn. When students are
able to see how they are doing in a class, they are
able to determine whether or not they understand
course material. Assessment can also help
motivate students. ... Just as assessment helps
students, assessment helps teachers.
 ROLE OF
ASSESSMENT
LEARNING OUTCOMES
 • Formal statements that articulate:
– What students are able to do
after instruction?
 A specific statement of what
students can demonstrate,
represent, or produce (Maki,2005)
 Observable, assessable, and
measurable
 Relevant and meaningful to learner
 students have to do their part
EFFECTIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES
ARE SMART

 Specific
 Measurable
 Attainable
 Relevant
 Time-bound
Ineffective learning
outcome are:
Intangible and poorly defined
Broad and not specific
Difficult to assess
Do not clearly define what
“competence” or mastery” of the
material looks like
Lengthy, jargony, “padded
 PARTS OF LEARNING OUTCOME
“A” for AUDIENCE Who?
 Make our learning outcomes student-centered
 TSWBAT= the student will be able to
 TLSBAT= the learner should be able to

“B” for BEHAVIOR

 What do you expect them to be able to do as a
result of the learning?

“C” for CRITERIA

What constitutes a minimum acceptable
performance?
 HOW TO WRITE LEARNING
OUTCOMES
 Remember to consider the student's perspective
when writing learning outcomes and ask what
should the student be able to know, do at the
end of this unit that they could not do at the
beginning.
 Start your learning outcome statements with an
action verb. For cognitive outcomes use verbs
that go beyond knowledge and comprehension.
Aim for higher-level verbs which require students
to evaluate, analyze, synthesize and critique.
The use of these verbs ensures that the learning
is measurable.
 Try to keep to one discrete learning
outcome per statement, unless they are
closely related.
 Focus only on what’s important; avoid the
trivial. An outcome statement should capture
in an integrated way the abilities, skills,
attitudes and/or values that will demonstrate
the attainment of that outcome.
Student Learning Outcome
 Tied to specific skills or products students
are expected to learn
 Are measurable

CHARACTERISTICS OF LEARNING
OUTCOMES
1. Good student learning outcomes are
centered on the students, on what the learners
are capable of doing instead of teaching
technique.

2. Good learning outcomes are based on the

program mission statement agreed upon by the
program faculty
 CHARACTERISTICS OF LEARNING
OUTCOMES

3.Good student learning outcomes are

very well understood by both students
and faculty.
4.Good learning outcomes include the
spectrum of thinking skills from simple
to higher order of knowledge and skills.
5.Good learning outcomes are
measurable.
 SOURCES OF EXPECTED
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOME
 The institution mission statement is a relevant
source of student learning expectation.
 Policies on competencies and standards by
government education agencies such as DEPED,
TESDA, CHED are prescribe sources of student
learning outcomes.
 • Expected competencies identified by the
different professions, business and industry
should be adopted to ensure that graduates are
able to perform as expected in their respective
work, places and or professions.
 SOURCES OF EXPECTED
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOME
 The thrusts and development goals of the
national government are useful
integration in the identified competencies
and expectations from all sector of
education.
 International trends and development
should also be considered in identifying
and determining student learning
outcomes to ensure the graduates
competitiveness in the employment and
professional practice abroad.
 Ithelped educators develop critical thinking
high order cognitive abilities in students.
 The purpose of this is to provide a
framework, for classifying in classroom lesson
objectives.
It aims to reach objectives of analyzing for
remedial classes and evaluation.
They sought to design a logical framework
for teaching and learning goals that would help
researchers and educators understand the
fundamental ways in w/c the learners acquire
and develop new knowledge , skills and
understanding.
*they focused on the Cognitive model, which
includes six different classification levels:
 Knowledge, “involves the recall of specifics
and universals, the recall of methods and
processes, or the recall of a pattern,
structure, or setting.”

 Comprehension, refers to a type of

understanding or apprehension such that the
individual knows what is being
communicated

 Application, refers to the “use of

abstractions in particular and concrete
situations.”
Analysis represents the
“breakdown of a communication into its
constituent elements or parts such that
the relative hierarchy of ideas is made
clear and/or the relations between ideas
expressed are made explicit.”
Synthesis involves the “putting
together of elements and parts so as to
form a whole.”
Evaluation engenders
“judgments about the value of material
and methods for given purposes.”
cognitive psychologists, curriculum theorists
and instructional researchers, and testing
and assessment specialists published in 2001
a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy with the
title A Taxonomy for Teaching, Learning,
and Assessment.
The authors of the revised taxonomy
using verbs and gerunds to label their
categories and subcategories (rather than
the nouns of the original taxonomy).
These “action words” describe the
cognitive processes by which thinkers
encounter and work with knowledge:
Summary:
 To develop critical thinking its students,
education use Blooms Taxonomy descriptive
verbs to write lesson objectives aligned to
different levels of Blooms Taxonomy.
*How can Bloom’s help with course design?
 Before you can understand a concept, you
must remember it .
 To apply a concept, you must first
understand it.  In order to evaluate a
concept, you must have analyzed it.
 To create an accurate conclusion you must
have completed a thorough evaluate.
CLASSIFICATION OF
LEARNING OUTCOME

COGNITIVE
AFFECTIVE
PSYCHOMOTOR
Learning outcomes pertains to a particular level of
knowledge, skills and values that a student has acquired at
the end of a unit or period of study as a result of his/her
engagement in a set of appropriate and meaningful learning
experiences.
Cognitive Domain Knowledge
Based Domain
It shows the levels of cognitive learning originally
devised by Bloom Taxonomy and revised by Anderseon,
Krathwohl in 2001
The cognitive domain involves the development of
knowledge and intellectual skills
Krathwohl stressed that the revised Taxonomy table is
not only used to classify instructional and learning
activities used to achieve the objectives.
Mariano and kendal came up with their own taxonomy
composed of three systems (Self System, Metacognitive
System and Cognitive System
What are the levels of cognitive
domain?
 CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING
OUTCOME: PSYCHOMOTOR (SKILLS-
BASED)
WHAT IS LEARNING OUTCOMES?
Are statements of performance expectations:
Cognitive, Psychomotor and Affective.

THE PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN FOCUSES ON

PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL SKILLS INVOLVING
COORDINATION OF THE BRAIN AND MUSCULAR
ACTIVITY.
It answers the question: “WHAT ACTION DO I
WANT LEARNERS TO BE ABLE TO PERFORM?”
 PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN
Pertains to the acquisition of skills at the end of a
topic as a result of his/her engagement in a set of
appropriate and meaningful learning experiences.

TAXONOMY OF PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN

1.OBSERVING
2.IMITATING
3.PRACTICING
4.ADAPTING
 CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING
OUTCOME: AFFECTIVE
 Affective (Values, Attitudes and Interests)
 Affective domain emphasizes knowledge.
 It tackles the question. “ What actions do I
want learners to think or care about?”
TYPES OF ASSESSMENT
METHOD
 Assessment methods can be
categorized according to the nature
and characteristics of each method.
 McMillan (2007) identified four
major categories:
1. Selected-Response
2. Constructed-Response
3. Teacher Observation
4. Student Self-Assessment
1.Selected-Response Format Students select from
a given set of options to answer a question or a
problem.
2. Constructed-Response Format Students need
only to recognize and select the correct answer.
The constructed response type is more useful in
targeting higher levels of cognition.

Categories of Constructed Response Format

Brief-constructed response items require only
short responses from students.
Performance Assessment requires students to
perform a task rather than select from a given set
of options.
Essay Assessment involve answering a question
or proposition in written form.
Oral Questioning is a common assessment
method during instruction to check on student
3. Teacher Observations are a form of on-going
assessment, usually done in combination with oral
questioning.
4. Student Self-Assessment it is a process where the
students are given a chance to reflect and rate
their own work and judge how well they have
performed in the relation to a set of assessment
criteria.
 MATCHING LEARNING TARGETS
WITH ASSESSMENT METHOD
 In an outcome-based approach, teaching
methods and resources that are used to
support learning as well as assessment tasks
and rubrics are explicitly linked to the
program and course learning outcomes.
 Constructive alignment provides the “how-
to” by verifying that the teachinglearning
activities (TLAs) and the assessment task
(ATs).
 Learning Target is defined as a description
of performance that includes what learners
should know and be able to do.
 KNOWLEDGE AND SIMPLE
UNDERSTANDING
 pertains to mastery of substantive subject
matter and procedures.
 in the revised Bloom’s taxonomy, this covers
the lower order thinking skills of
remembering, understanding and applying.
Deep understanding and
reasoning
 involve higher order thinking skills of
analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing.
students may be asked to compare and contrast
two topics or ideas, or explain the pros and cons
of an argument
 Skills performance assessment is obviously the
superior assessment method.
 Products are most adequately assessed through
performance task.
is a substantial and tangible output that
showcases a student’s understanding of
concepts and skills and their ability to apply,
analyze, evaluate and integrate those concepts
and skills.
 Affect cannot be assessed by selected-response or
briefconstructed response tests.
 it pertains to attitudes, interests and values
students manifest.
 VALIDITY
AND
RELIABILITY
VALIDITY

 from the latin word Validus, meaning

strong
 “measures what it is supposed to
measure”
 the accuracy of the inferences teachers
make about students based on the
information gathered from an assessment
(McMillan, 2007: Fives & DiDonato-Barnes,
2013).
 TYPES OF VALIDITY
1. Content-Related Evidence refers to the
relationship between a test and the
instructional objectives, establishes content
so that the test measures what it is supposed
to measure
 Face Validity – determined based on
subjective opinion of the one reviewing it
 Instructional Validity – systematically sensitive
to the nature of instruction offered
 Table of Specification (TOS) – test blue print
identifies the content area and the cognitive
domain
2. Criterion-Related Evidence
a validation that refers to the extent
to which scores from a test relate to
theoretically similar measures
concurrent validity – uses predictor data
and criterion at the same time
predictive validity – uses predictor data
to estimate accurately the outcome of the
students performance (criterion) at later
time.
3.Construct-Related Evidence
a validation that refers to the measure
of the extent to which a test measures a
theoretical and observable

convergent validity – constructs that are

related are in fact observed to be related
divergent validity – constructs that are
unrelated are in reality observed not to be
 factor analysis – uses complex statistical
procedures conducted with different
procedures
FACTORS AFFECTING THE VALIDITY
AND RELIABILITY OF A TEST ITEM
 the test itself
 the administration and scoring of a
test
 personal factors influencing how
students response to the test
 validity is always specific to a
particular group
 REASONS THAT REDUCES THE
VALIDITY OF THE TEST ITEM
 Poorly constructed test items
 Unclear directions
 Ambiguous test items
 Too difficult vocabulary
 Complicated syntax
 Inadequate time limit
 Inappropriate level of difficulty
 Unintended clues
 Improper arrangement of test items
Reliability
the consistency with which it yields the same
rank for individuals who take the test more
than once (Kubizyn and Borich, 2007)

4 Methods of Reliability
1.Test-retest Method –
determined by administering the same test
twice to the same group of students with any
time interval between the tests.
2. Equivalent Form – determined by
administering two different but equivalent
forms of the test (also called parallel or
alternate forms)
4 Methods of Reliability

3. Split-half Method – administer

test once and score two equivalent halves
of the test
4. Kuder-Richardson Formula
– administer the test once
 FACTORS AFFECTING THE
RELIABILITY OF A TEST ITEM
 Length of the test
 Moderate item difficulty
 Objective scoring
 Heterogeneity of the student
group
 Limited time
 Type of
Method Reliability Measure Procedure Statistical Measure

1. Test-Retest Measure of stability Give a test twice to the same Pearson r

group with any time interval
between tests from several
minutes to several years

2. Equivalent Measure of Give parallel forms of tests with Pearson r

Forms equivalence close time interval between forms

3. Test-Retest Measure of stability Give parallel forms of tests with Pearson r

with and equivalence increased time interval between
Equivalent forms
Forms

4. Split Half Measure of internal Give a test once. Score equivalent Pearson r and
consistency halves of the test e.g. odd-and- Spearman Brown
even numbered items Formula

5. Kuder- Measure of internal Give the test once then correlate Kuder-Richardson
Richardson consistency the proportion / percentage of the Formula 20 and 21
students passing and not passing
a given item
 PRACTICALITY AND EFFICIENCY
 Practical
 “useful”  It can be used to improve classroom
instruction
 for outcomes assessment purposes
 likewise pertains to judicious use of classroom
time.
Efficient
 pertains to development of assessment
 administration of assessment
 grading of assessment with the least waste of
resources and effort
 FACTORS ON PRACTICALITY
AND EFFICIENCY
 Teacher familiarity with the method
 Time required
 Complexity or Ease in
administration
 Ease of Scoring
 Ease of Interpretation
 Cost
FAMILIARITY WITH THE METHODS
teachers should learn the strengths
and weaknesses of each method of
assessment, how they are
developed, administered and
marked.
 teachers should be familiar with the
assessment or the test
TIME REQUIRED
 a desirable assessment is short yet able to
provide valid and reliable results
 quick to develop but not to the point of
reckless construction
 scored promptly but not without basis
EASE IN ADMINISTRATION
 assessment should be easy to administer
 instructions must be clear and complete
 Directions and procedures for
administrations and procedures are clear
and that little time and effort is needed
EASE OF SCORING
 Selected response formats are the easiest to score
compared to restricted and more so extended-
response essays.
 Selected response test are objectively marked
because each item has one correct answer
 Use scoring procedures appropriate to your
method and purpose. The easier the procedure,
the more reliable the assessment is.
EASE OF INTERPRETATION
 Objective test are the easiest to interpret
 Establishing standard, teacher is able to determine
right away if a student passed the test
 Interpretation is easier if there was a plan on how
to use the results prior to assessment.
 COST
 Classroom assessments are generally
inexpensive compared to national or high
stakes test.
 Other things being equal, the less expense
used to gather information, the better