Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tayag V Yuseco

    Uploaded by

    Ralph Christian Zorilla
    126 views10 pages
    This document discusses the case of Tayag v. yuseco G.R. No. L-14043 regarding whether Tayag can be compelled to buy a lot. The Supreme Court ruled that based on Article 448, the owner of land where another has built in good faith has the right to require the builder to buy the land, unless the land value is considerably more than the building value, in which case reasonable rent must be paid. Once a choice has been made and ordered by the court, the landowner can no longer change their mind.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Tayag v Yuseco

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document discusses the case of Tayag v. yuseco G.R. No. L-14043 regarding whether Tayag can be compelled to buy a lot. The Supreme Court ruled that based on Article 448, the owner of land where another has built in good faith has the right to require the builder to buy the land, unless the land value is considerably more than the building value, in which case reasonable rent must be paid. Once a choice has been made and ordered by the court, the landowner can no longer change their mind.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    126 views10 pages

    Tayag V Yuseco

    Uploaded by

    Ralph Christian Zorilla
    This document discusses the case of Tayag v. yuseco G.R. No. L-14043 regarding whether Tayag can be compelled to buy a lot. The Supreme Court ruled that based on Article 448, the owner of land where another has built in good faith has the right to require the builder to buy the land, unless the land value is considerably more than the building value, in which case reasonable rent must be paid. Once a choice has been made and ordered by the court, the landowner can no longer change their mind.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 10

    Tayag v

    yuseco
    G.R. No. L-14043 | April 16, 1959 | Montemayor, J.
    You have been so good to our family.
    No. In rendered
    You’ve expressionyour
    of my gratitude,
    professional
    I’m offering
    services you
    free of two lots where
    compensation. you
    Thank
    Oh
    Hehe.
    wow!That’s
    Thankokay.
    you! can build your house.
    you!
    You have two choices: either you pay
    me P120.00 as monthly rental or you
    get our of my property!
    Uhm. 3rd choice, No.
    Okay. We are willing to sell the lot
    but we are also willing to buy the
    buildings erected here if its value is as
    Okay. Buy it for P50,000.00. it should be and determined by
    evidence!
    WHAAAAAAT?!
    Okay. Buy it for P50,000.00.
    NO WAY! We retain a right or option
    to make a choice and even if that’s
    our choice, we can’t be compelled
    Okay. Buy it for P50,000.00. because we can’t afford that.
    Whether or not
    tayag can be
    compelled to buy
    the lot
    Yes.
    Art. 448. The owner of the land on which anything has been built, sown or planted in
    good faith, shall have the right to appropriate as his own the works, sowing or planting,
    after payment of the indemnity provided for in Articles 546 and 548, or to oblige the one
    who built or planted to pay the price of the land, and the one who sowed, the proper
    rent. However, the builder or planter cannot be obliged to buy the land if its value is
    considerably more than that of the building or trees. In such case, he shall pay
    reasonable rent, if the owner of the land does not choose to appropriate the building or
    trees after proper indemnity. The parties shall agree upon the terms of the lease and in
    case of disagreement, the court shall fix the terms thereof.
    Yes.
    Once a party, in conformity with the court, has made a
    choice, duly informed the court of his choice and duly
    ordered to comply the same, the landowner can no longer
    change his or her mind.

    This is part of the judicial machinery of due process.

    You might also like