Report For The Glo-Go Ball Company - FINAL
Report For The Glo-Go Ball Company - FINAL
Glo-Go Ball
Company
Presented by the Zuc Design Group
• We, the Zuc Design Group (led by Zaw and Phuc), are tasked
on creating alternative designs on the Glo-Go Ball’s packaging.
• We designed these alternatives for the original design is known
for rolling out of the shelf when put into display, hence, we
used flat-surface rectangular boxes as the company requested.
Common
4 3
Calculations
¿ 𝜋 𝑟 ×8
3
Original Design
8 balls
8 x 6cm = 48cm
2 ball 1 ball
2 balls 2 x 6cm = 4 balls 1 x 6cm = 6cm
2 x 6cm = 12cm 4 x 6cm = 24cm
12cm 1 balls
1 balls 1 x 6cm = 6cm
1 x 6cm =
6cm
8 balls
8 x 6cm = 48cm
Original
Design
Calculation
1 ball Volume of the Cylinder
1 x 6cm = 6cm V = πr2h
V = π(3)2 × (48)
V = 1357.168
V = 1357cm3
Net
Volume of Empty Space
V = Cylinder − 8 Balls
V= 1357cm3 −
V= 452.22 cm3 (4 or less don’t round up so..)
V= 452cm3
Surface Area of Rectangle
SA = 2(LH+LW+HW)
SA = 2((12 × 12) + (12 × 12) + (12 × 12))
2 balls SA = 2(144 + 144 + 144)
2 x 6cm =12cm SA = 864 cm2
Alternate 2 balls
2 x 6cm =
2 ball
2 x 6cm =
12cm
Amount of Packaging
SA = 864 cm2 8.64 m2
Cost of Packaging
$ = SA Rectangle × 4.20
$ = 8.64 m2 × 4.20
12cm
Design $ = 36.28
Calculation:
Model 1 Net
Design $ = 37.29
Calculation:
Model 2 Net
Alternate 1 balls
1 x 6cm = 6cm
Amount of Packaging
984 cm2 9.84 m2
Cost of Packaging
$ = SA Rectangle × 4.20
$ = 9.84 m2 × 4.20
1 balls
Design 1 x 6cm =
6cm
$ = 41.32
Calculation:
Model 3 Net
We believe Model 1 will replace the Original Design, due to it having one of the least Packaging amount,
compact size, and because of its cheap cost in packaging.