A vessel collided with an unmarked and unlit jetty in Wilhelmshaven, Germany, causing damage. The port authority claimed damages from the vessel owners. Surveyors found that the jetty was not marked or illuminated. The vessel master had collected evidence from crew shortly after the incident that supported the surveyors' findings. This contemporaneous evidence persuaded the port authority to substantially reduce their claim for damages.
A vessel collided with an unmarked and unlit jetty in Wilhelmshaven, Germany, causing damage. The port authority claimed damages from the vessel owners. Surveyors found that the jetty was not marked or illuminated. The vessel master had collected evidence from crew shortly after the incident that supported the surveyors' findings. This contemporaneous evidence persuaded the port authority to substantially reduce their claim for damages.
A vessel collided with an unmarked and unlit jetty in Wilhelmshaven, Germany, causing damage. The port authority claimed damages from the vessel owners. Surveyors found that the jetty was not marked or illuminated. The vessel master had collected evidence from crew shortly after the incident that supported the surveyors' findings. This contemporaneous evidence persuaded the port authority to substantially reduce their claim for damages.
A vessel came into contact with a disused jetty in
Wilhelmshaven and the port authority brought a claim for damages against the owners. The attending surveyors found that the jetty was not marked and more importantly not illuminated .The port authorities denied these allegations. However the master shortly after the incident, had collected evidence from crew that the jetty was not lit and made particular reference to this point in his report. These contemporaneous evidence which supported surveyors’ findings persuaded port authority to substantially reduce their claim for damages Comments
• Damage caused by a vessel to fixed or floating object
often gives rise to large claims which owners have great difficulty in defending. • Normally in many countries owners and the vessels are held liable for such damages although vessel and crew in no way at fault. • Damage may be caused by vessel coming into direct contact or caused by vessel’s wash. • In most instances claims for such damages covered by P& I insurance When such incidents occur
• Damage to fixed and floating objects usually occur
when a vessel entering or leaving a port • When entering a port, master should report the incident to the owners asap. If possible contact the local P & I club representative and request them to attend and assist. • If such damage occurs when vessel is leaving port, master should resist any temptation to ignore the incident in hope that the damage will be minimal and there was no witness. Owners should be notified asap to ascertain the extent of the damage Evidence required from the vessel
In order to assist the surveyors appointed by the owners and
their insurers in case of such damage to shore & floating objects, master should log down, collect all relevant evidence Even if the damage is of minor nature. This will help to minimise any unfair heavy claim by authorities, In the event of minor damages to shore & floating objects Facts that should be in master’s statement
• As correct as possible mention, date, time, location, name
number of the object pier ect. • Prevailing conditions- Day or night, weather, visibility, sea state, swell, tides, current ect. • Details of the manoeuvre • Name and addresses of all crew members, pilots, tug crew, and any witnesses. • Statement from witnesses • Details of the damaged object whether old or new, already damaged or not, well illuminated and marked • Video and photographic evidence