Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27

Insurance Securitization

Rick Gorvett, FCAS, MAAA, ARM, Ph.D.


Actuarial Science Program
University of Illinois
at Urbana-Champaign

International Association of Consulting Actuaries


Hershey, PA
June 2000
Risk and Response

• Risk
– Recent catastrophes
– Resulting insolvencies and financial
impairment
– Potential for even greater impact
• Response
– Development of securitized insurance
products
What is “Securitization of
Insurance Risk”?

• Insurance company transfers underwriting


risks to the capital markets by transforming
underwriting cash flows into tradable
financial securities
• Cash flows (e.g., repayment of interest
and/or principal) are contingent upon an
insurance event / risk
Securitization in
Historical Perspective
• Home mortgage market: funding shortfall in the
late 1970s
• Market response: mortgage-backed securities
• Other asset-backed securities developed
subsequently
– Auto loans
– Credit card receivables
– David Bowie albums
Securitization Process
• Participants
– Borrower
– Loan originator
– Special purpose trust
– Underwriter
– Investors
• Some of the Benefits
– Liquidity
– Market values
– Lower cost
– Improved credit rating
Evolution of the Insurance
Industry
“Affronts” to Traditional Insurance

• Self-insurance and captives

• Risk retention groups

• Insurance securitization

• Portfolio insurance
Risks Which P/C Insurers Face
• Underwriting
– Loss experience: frequency and severity
– Underwriting cycle
– Inflation
– Payout patterns
– Catastrophes
• Investment
– Interest rate risk
– Capital market performance

All of these risks can prevent a company from meeting its


objectives
Insurance Securitization in Context:
Managing Risks

• Insurance securitization is one of many


financial risk management (FRM) techniques
• Building blocks of FRM:
– Stocks and bonds
– Forwards and futures
– Options
– Swaps
Factors Affecting the
Recent Development of
Insurance Securitization
• Recent catastrophe experience
– Reassessment of catastrophe risk
– Demand for and pricing of reinsurance
– Reinsurance supply issues
• Capital market developments
– Development of new asset classes and asset-backed
markets
– Search for yield and diversification
• Restructuring of insurance industry
Possible Reasons for Securitizing
Insurance Risks
• Capacity
– Risk of huge catastrophe losses
– Would severely impair P/C industry capital
– Capital markets could handle
• Investment
– Catastrophe exposure is uncorrelated with overall
capital markets
– Thus, uncorrelated with existing portfolios
– Diversification potential
Issues Regarding the Potential
Success of Insurance Securitization
• Difficult to understand
– Capital markets
– Insurance markets
• Separation of insurance and finance functions in
many companies
• Information and technology
• Difficult to price
• Expensive (vs. cat. reinsurance market)
• Legal / tax / accounting issues
Types of Insurance Instruments
• Those that transfer risk
– Reinsurance
– Exchange-traded derivatives
– Swaps
– Catastrophe bonds
• Those that provide contingent capital
– Letter of credit
– Contingent surplus notes
– Catastrophe equity puts
Exchange-Traded Derivatives

• Chicago Board of Trade


– Option spreads ~ reinsurance
– PCS: daily index values
– Nine geographic products
• Bermuda Commodities Exchange
– Binary options
– Guy Carpenter Catastrophe Index
– Seven geographic products
Risk Exchanges and Swaps

• CATEX New York


– Electronic bulletin board
– Catastrophe exposure swaps
• CATEX Bermuda
– Joint venture: CATEX and Bermuda Stock
Exchange
• Swaps
Catastrophe Bonds:
The Trigger Issue
• Basis risk
– How closely do the company’s losses follow the
industry index?
• Moral hazard
– Increased losses to company may decrease the debt
obligations

Trade-off between basis risk and moral hazard


Direct versus industry versus event triggers
Types of Bond Triggers
• Direct: based on company losses
– E.g., USAA catastrophe bond
– No basis risk
• Industry: based on an index
– E.g., Swiss Re; CBOT PCS option spreads
– Essentially no moral hazard
• Event
– E.g., Tokio Marine & Fire
– Earthquake magnitude
Types of Catastrophe Bond
Risk-Taking

• Risk of losing some or all of your principal


– Defeasement of principal with U.S. Treasuries?
• Risk of diminished or lost interest payments
• Often, several “tranches” with different
yields and ratings
Typical Catastrophe Bond
Issuance Structure

• Insurance company sets up an SPV (Special


Purpose Vehicle) -- offshore reinsurer
• Company purchases reinsurance contract
from SPV
• Company issues bonds to capital markets
through SPV
Some Successful Bond Issues

• USAA: company’s hurricane losses


• Swiss Re: industry’s California E/Q losses
• Tokio Marine & Fire: Tokyo E/Q magnitude
• Centre Re: company’s Florida hurricane losses
• Yasuda Fire & Marine: typhoon losses
• Swiss Re: “basis swap” with reinsurer
Generally Common Traits of
Successful Bond Issues

• Involve catastrophe risk


• High levels of protection
• Relatively short maturities
• Some protection of principal included
• High coupon rates
“Costs” of Catastrophe Bonds

• High yields
– Default premiums may be high for a time
• Setting up SPV
• Investment banking fees
– Advising
– Spread
• Legal fees
Contingent Capital

• Contingent surplus notes


– Option to borrow, contingent upon some event or
trigger
– Right to issue surplus notes
• Catastrophe equity puts
– Put option (right to sell)
– Right to issue shares of stock, contingent upon some
event or trigger
The Future of Insurance
Securitization

• Will it survive and grow?


– Cost relative to insurance and reinsurance
– Time and technology
• Will it replace or supplement traditional
transactions?
• How will it affect reinsurance?
The Future of Insurance
Securitization (cont.)

• Capacity versus other reasons


• Catastrophe risks versus traditional
insurance lines
• Historically, markets for other forms of
securitizations have taken some time to
develop and mature
The Future of Insurance
Securitization (cont.)

• Legal and tax issues


– Are securitization instruments insurance?
– Bermuda Insurance Amendment Act (1998):
insurance derivatives are “investment contracts”
– Different tax implications:
• Protect income statement
• Protect balance sheet
The Future of Insurance
Securitization (cont.)
• Insurer FRM can take a variety of forms
– Asset hedges
• Reinsurance
• Derivatives
– Liability hedges
• Debt forgiveness
– Asset-liability management
– Contingent financing
– Post-loss financing and recapitalization
Personal Info

• Web page:

http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~gorvett

• E-mail:

[email protected]

You might also like