…Cont'd Classification of OMC: η1 (monohapto) form as a σ ligand &
…Cont'd Classification of OMC: η1 (monohapto) form as a σ ligand &
3. Metal allyl
The allyl ligand is often referred to as an “actor” ligand rather than a “spectator”
ligand. It binds to metals in two ways.
η1 (monohapto) form as a σ ligand &
η3 (trihapto) form as a σ + π ligand ----a 3-carbon delocalized
allylic system
The π-allyl complex is believed to be formed via the σ-bonded allyl derivatives of the
metal.
M
The σ-cpd is transformed to the π-cpd (η3-allyl complex) by thermal or photochemical
energy. Such a complex is called a fluxional complex; it isomerizes with a little energy.
CO CH2
CO CO CO
CO CO
Mo CH
+ Mo CH2 CH CH2
CH2
Heat
Cl
CO
CO CO
σ-cpd, yellow oil
Mo
CH
iv. Some allyl complexes are obtained by protonation of. a diene complex.
M M
M The bonding interaction b/n the
The metal & the olefin are metal & the olefin is delocalized
The metal is bonded to the involved in σ,σ,π interaction
two π orbitals π interaction
The Dewar−Chatt model, when applied to 1,3−butadiene, predicts that the ligand
may bind to metal either as a L2 (π2) donor type or as an LX2 (σ2π) donor type.
The L2 binding of 1,3−butadiene is rare, e.g. as in (butadiene)Fe(CO)3, while
An implication of the LX2 type binding is in the observed shortening of the
C2−C3 (1.40 Å) distance alongside the lengthening of the C1−C2 (1.46 Å) &
MOs of
butadiene
2π-bonding & 2π*-antibonding orbitals
The antibonding orbital ψ3 receives e-- density by back donation from the
metal
The central C-C bond is shortened.
Eg. In Butadienetricarbonyl Iron
1.45Ao 1.4
A 5
o
Fe
OC CO
CO
The central C-C bond is (1.45Ao ) is shortened from 1.48Ao in free butadiene.
Though cisoid binding is often observed in metal butadiene complexes, a few
instances of transoid binding is seen in trinuclear, e.g. as in Os3(CO)10(C4H6), &
MO of Cyclobutadiene complex ?
Metal carbonyl compounds
Requirements
The carbonyl ligand is a π-acid in the Lewis sense, where it receives electrons
from the metal ion, & it is a π–acid because this involves π-bonding.
The π-bonding involves overlap of the π* orbitals of the CO with d orbitals from
the t2g set of the metal, & so is dπ-pπ bonding.
The structures involved in the π-acid nature of CO are:
What stabilizes CO complexes? It is M→C π–bonding.
The lower the formal charge on the metal ion, the more willing it is to donate
electrons to the π–orbitals of the CO. Thus, metal ions with higher formal
charges, e.g. Fe(II) form CO complexes with much greater difficulty than do zero-
valent metal ions such as Cr(O) & Ni(O), or negatively charged metal ions such
as
V(-I).
The π–overlap is pictured as involving d-orbitals of the metal & the π*–
orbitals of the CO:
2p
Bonding
Sequence of bonding
1st A pair of e- is donated from the π-acid to the metal centre.
Then, the excess e- density around the metal centre is donated back
to the empty orbitals on the ligand.
CO donates 2e-s to the system from the σnb orbitals on C.
The HOMO & LUMO of CO
M-CO’s are important for their rich properties & applications in many industrial
processes that include :
catalysis,
medical diagnostics &
molecular sensors
Mond process,1890
Ni(CO)4 → Ni0 + 4CO
Mononuclear
Metal carbonyls
polynuclear
END OF SESSION 4