Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

The Lord is my protector; he is my strong

fortress. My God is my protection, and


with Him I am safe. He protects me like a
shield; He defends me and keeps me safe.
Psalm 18:2
Occupational
Health and
Safety
Chapter 4
Workplace injuries:
inevitable, or not?
In early 2009, a labour hire worker (whom we will call Frank) was placed with
a recycling firm, SITA, to perform welding work at their Parramatta site. SITA
is a large organisation, employing around 1600 workers as well as 500 labour
hire workers and contractors across over 100 sites. Frank had more than 20
years' experience in the mining industry, but had not worked in waste
processing before being placed with SITA.
When Frank started at SITA, he was shown around the site but not
provided with a site safety induction; he says he was advised what his job
would be and told not to steal anything. Frank's employer, the labour hire
company, also did not provide safety or induction training. Frank's knowledge
of safe work practices was limited to what he had learned in the mining
industry. Six months after commencing at SITA, Frank was performing
welding work on a hydraulic baling machine. He thought he had isolated the
machine and that it could not be powered up. He had not been instructed on
how to isolate the machine but had done so through trial and error.
Unfortunately, the machine started while he was atop the shute and he was
dragged into the machine. Both of his legs and one hand were immediately
severed. After 2 hours of being trapped (while still conscious), Frank was
finally released from the machine. He suffered other major injuries in addition
to the amputations. SITA and Frank's labour hire employer both had OHS
systems in place that appeared relatively comprehensive on paper but neither
was well implemented. SITA was fined $130 000 and a SITA manager placed
on an 18-month good behaviour bond; Frank's employer was fined $117 500.
The incident had a major impact upon SITA's approach to its management
of OHS. Among the significant changes introduced were regular toolbox
safety talks with all workers on site (whether they be employees, labour
hire or contractors); a process for identifying training needs of all workers
on site supported by the development of an online induction training
program; an annual safety week to reinforce the importance of safety at
worksites; and, emphasising the importance now given to OHS by senior
managers, the national safety manager was appointed to the company's
executive management committee. Frank's employer, the labour hire
company, also implemented changes intended to instil the importance of
OHS among all managers. Additional training now includes competency-
based assessment in OHS; there is more regular communication with
employees; and there are fortnightly safety meetings as well as a national
database system for tracking clients and workers. Frank, who now gets
around with a wheelchair, skateboard and scooter, along with prosthetic
legs for stairs, has since become a campaigner on OHS and an active
member of the Amputee Association of Sydney Inc. At a presentation to a
national safety conference in 2011, he stated, ‘I should have walked away
that day. If it doesn't feel right it probably isn't ... Everyone is a safety
officer. Speak up. Ask questions. If you see someone doing something
wrong, talk to them. Maybe you have seen something they have missed’
(SIA 2011).
Critical Thinking
Questions:

01 02
Why is safety training so important How could training have been
for new workers? improved at this case study
organisation?
THANK
YOU!

You might also like