Non-institutional correction refers to methods of punishing offenders without imprisonment. These include executive clemency, probation, community service programs, and other alternatives where a level of trust exists between offenders and authorities. The document discusses executive clemency, community-based correction programs, benefits, purposes and functions of non-institutional correction. It also provides a history of probation in the Philippines and statutory attributes and basic guidelines for probation application and its consequences.
Non-institutional correction refers to methods of punishing offenders without imprisonment. These include executive clemency, probation, community service programs, and other alternatives where a level of trust exists between offenders and authorities. The document discusses executive clemency, community-based correction programs, benefits, purposes and functions of non-institutional correction. It also provides a history of probation in the Philippines and statutory attributes and basic guidelines for probation application and its consequences.
Non-institutional correction refers to methods of punishing offenders without imprisonment. These include executive clemency, probation, community service programs, and other alternatives where a level of trust exists between offenders and authorities. The document discusses executive clemency, community-based correction programs, benefits, purposes and functions of non-institutional correction. It also provides a history of probation in the Philippines and statutory attributes and basic guidelines for probation application and its consequences.
What is Non-Institutional Correction? Non-Institutional Correction
refer to that method
of correcting sentenced offenders without having to go to prison. What is EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY? Executive Clemency
Shall refer to the following:
Pardon (act of Grace) Amnesty (oblivion) Reprieve Commutation of Sentence Executive Clemency
Recommendation granting EC for the prisoner
given by the trial court or appellate court. Penalty imposed is too harsh. Presence of material evidence which was not considered by the court, which would have justified an acquittal of the accused prior to his conviction. Inmate was a minor (over 15 but less than 18) at the time of the commission of the offense. Inmate is 70 years old and above whose continued confinement in prison is hazardous to his health.
Inmate is suffering from serious and contagious
diseases or life threatening illness, or with severe physical disability such as those who are totally blind, paralyzed, bedridden, and the likes are recommended by a physician of the Bureau of Corrections Hospital and certified under oath by a physician designated by the DOH. Alien inmates where diplomatic considerations and amity among nations necessitates review.
Such similar and analogous
circumstances whenever the interest of justice will be served thereby. Other Community Based Correction Programs 1. Work Release 2. Day Fine Programs 3. Electronic Monitoring 4. Home Confinement 5. Community service 6. Half way houses 7. Boot camp prisons 8. Restitution 9. Check-In Programs 10. Mediation 11. Curfew 12. Restorative justice centers 13. Drug Checks 14. Alcohol checks 15. Other methods where there is a certain level of trust between the offenders and the people involved. Benefits of Community Bases Correction 1. Strengthening family ties through avoidance of broken family relationship- The treatment and rehabilitation of convicted offender is done outside the institutional facilities hence, family members will not suffer broken family due to imprisonment of one of its member; 2. Prevention of Influence Contamination- Putting convicted felon to prison may expose him to hardened criminals who might influence him to be a more hardened criminal than before; 3. Engagement of Community Involvement- Rehabilitation can be more effective with the help of the members of the community; 4. Assurance of Individualized Treatment Approach- These programs provide individualized treatment program for the convicts which is not available, it is hard to attain in correctional institution; 5. It is more economical than Institution-based correction on the part of the Government. Purposes;
1. Facilitating Convicts re-integration
2. Fostering Convicts Rehabilitation 3. Providing an Alternative Range of Convicts Punishment 4. Heightening Convicts Accountability Functions of Community-based Program 1. Client monitoring and supervision to ensure program compliance 2. Ensuring public safety 3. Employment assistance 4. Individual and group counseling 5. Educational training and literacy services 6. Networking with other community agencies and business 7. Reducing jail and prison overcrowding. Probation- derived from the Word LATIN verb “ Probare” means “to prove or to test” which was coined by John Augustus. The Law defined probation as a disposition, under which a convicted individual is released subject to conditions imposed by the Court and to the supervision of a probation officer. History of Probation in the Philippines 1. Probation was first introduced in the Philippines during the American colonial period (1898-1945) with the enactment of Act No. 4221 of the Philippine Legislature on August 7, 1935. This Law created a Probation Office under the Department of Justice. 2. On November 16, 1937, after barely two years of existence, the supreme court of the Philippines declared the Probation Law unconstitutional because of some defects in the laws of procedural framework. 3. In 1972, House Bill No. 393 was files in Congress by Congressman Teodolo Natividad (Considered as the Father of Probation in the Philippines) of Bulacan, which would establish a probation system in the Philippines. This bill Avoided the objectionable features of Act 4221 that struct down the 1935 law as unconstitutional. The bill was passed by the House of Representatives, but was pending in the Senate when Martial Law was declared and Congress was abolished. 4. In 1975, after 18 technical hearings over a period of six months, the draft decree was presented to a selected group of 369 jurist, penologist, civic leaders and social and behavioral scientist and practitioners sponsored by the National Police Commission and University of the Philippines Law Center. 5. On July 24, 1976, Presidential Decree No. 968, also known as Adult Probation Law of 1976, was signed into Law by the late President Ferdinand E. Marcos. 6. The start-up of the Probation system in 1976-1977 was a massive undertaking during which all judges and prosecutors nationwide were trained in probation methods and procedures; administrative and procedural manuals were developed; Probation officers recruited and trained and the central agency and probation field offices organized throughout the country. Fifteen selected probation officers were sent to United States for orientation and training in probation administration. Upon their return, they were assigned to be trainers for the newly recruited probation officers. 7. The Probation system started to operate on January 3, 1978. As more probation officers were recruited and trained, more field offices were opened. Statutory Attributes of Philippine Probation system 1. It is a “once in a lifetime affair”, meaning that a convicted person can only avail, the privilege of a probation once in a lifetime. If he is convicted again, such person can no longer avail himself of another probation. 2. Selective application. Probation is made available only to those convicted of certain crimes. Crimes against national security, like Treason and espionage are excluded. Those who sentence to prison term of more than six years are also excluded from the probation privilege. 3. Persons under Probation retain their civil rights, like the right to vote, or practice one’s profession, or exercise parental or marital authority. 4. The suspension of the execution of the sentence is conditional, violations of any of the condition may cause revocation of the privilege. 5. Conditions of probation to be imposed by the court to protect public safety and to foster the rehabilitation and reformation of the probationer. 6. Jurisdiction of the court is continuing in character. 7. Post Sentence Investigation Report is Mandatory, which will serve as informational guide for the court’s decision in granting or denying the same. 8. Supervision, guidance and assistance by the Probation Officer over the probationer. Basic Guidelines for Probation Application Application for Probation shall be filed with the trial court, which has jurisdiction over the case. Such court is the very same court that heard, tried, decided and imposed penalty against the convicted person. Note: There is no other court that can exercise jurisdiction regarding probation application, except for the trial court which previously exercise jurisdiction over the criminal offense. The filing of an application for probation is jurisdictional. The time of filing shall be within the period for perfecting an appeal. Under the Revised Rules of Court the period of perfecting an appeal is fifteen (15) days. The application shall be in the form approved by the secretary of Justice as recommended by the PPA Administrator. The Trial court may notify the concerned prosecuting officer of the filling of the applicant at a reasonable time it deems necessary, before the schedule hearing thereof. The prosecuting officer may submit his comment, if any, on the application within reasonable time given to him by the trial court from his receipt of the notice for him to comment. If the Trial court finds that the application is due in form and the applicant appears to be qualified for the grant of probation, it shall order the city or provincial Parole and Probation Office to conduct a post- sentence investigation and submit the same within (60) Sixty days from the receipt of the order of said court to conduct the investigation. The court has five (5) days from the time the court received the post-sentence investigation report to resolve the application. Consequence of Filing of Application for Probation The Trial court, upon receipt of the application filed, suspend the execution of the sentence imposed on the judgement. Pending submission of the post-sentence investigation and resolution on the application, the applicant may be allowed on temporary liberty under his bail filed in the criminal case. Where no bail is filed or applicant is incapable of filing one, the trial court may allow the release of the applicant on recognizance. Note: Recognizance is a mode of securing the release of any person in custody or detention for the commission of an offense who is unable to post bail due to abject poverty. The court where the case of such person has been filed shall allow the release of the accused on recognizance as provided herein, to the custody of a qualified member of the brangay, city or municipality where the accused resides. Post-sentence Investigation (PSI)- No person shall be placed on probation except upon prior investigation by the probation officer and a determination by the court that the ends of justice and the best interest of the public as well as that of the applicant for probation will be served thereby. Note: Post sentence Investigation is mandatory it is a pre-requisite in granting probation. The court has no jurisdiction to render decision whether to grant or deny the application in the absence of PSI. Period for Submission of Investigation Report The Probation officer shall submit to the Court the investigation report on a defendant not later than sixty (60) days from receipt of the order of said court to conduct the investigation. The court shall resolve the petition for probation not later than five (5) days after receipt of said report. Pending submission of the investigation report and the resolution of the petition, the defendant may be allowed on temporary liberty under his bail filed in the criminal case; Provided, that, in case where no bail was filed or that the defendant is incapable of filing one, the court may allow the release of the defendant on Recognize the custody of a Responsible member of the community who shall guarantee his appearance whenever required by the Court. Purpose of Post Sentence Investigation Report (PSIR) To an able the trial court to determine whether or not the ends of justice and the best interest of the public primarily, as well as that of the applicant, would be served by the grant or denial of the application. Note: Within 60 days from receipt of the order of the Court- Probation Officer shall conduct Post Sentence Investigation. Within 5 days from receipt of the Post Sentence Investigation Report- The Court shall resolve the petition for probation. Bail may be allowed during the pendency of the Of the Investigation or pending resolution for Probation. No need to post additional bail, the same bail posted for criminal case may be used. Recognizance may be allowed when the applicant for probation is incapable to post bail. Rule on Bail under Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure is applicable. FULL BLOWN COURTESY INVESTIGATION (FBCI) Is a general courtesy investigation from another city or provincial parole and probation office, which request for a complete PSIR on petition for probation is a judicial function. When FBCI takes place? 1. Applicant for probation is a transient offender in the place of commission of the crime and/ or a permanent resident of another place. 2. He spent his pre-adolescent and/or adolescent life in the province or city of origin. 3. He attend and/or finished his education thereat. 4. His immediate family members, collateral informants or disinterested persons and officials who can best authenticate the inter-family relationship, upbringing behavior of the applicant for probation in the community are residents of the place of his origin. Case Analysis: Pedro was convicted of a crime and sentenced to a prison term more than six years (Beyond the probationable limit of six years). He appealed his case and the appellate court modified his sentence below six years. Question: May Pedro Apply for Probation? Answer: Yes, by virtue of specific provision of RA 10707 “when a judgement of conviction imposing a non- probationable penalty is appealed or reviewed, and such judgement modified through the imposition of a probationable penalty, the defendant shall be allowed to apply for probation based on the modified decision before such decision becomes final. The application for probation based on the modified decision shall be filed in the trial court where the judgement of conviction imposing a non-probationable penalty was rendered, or in the trial court where such case has since been re- raffled”. Note: Appeal and Probation are mutually exclusive remedies. An accused who applies for probation admits his guilt and the application and cancellation of his bail bond. It renders the judgement of conviction final and executory. When Probation Order become Effective It shall take effect upon its issuance at which time court shall inform the offender of the consequences threat and explain that upon his failure to comply with any of the conditions prescribed in the said order or his commission of another offense under which he was placed on probation. Arrest of Probationer; Subsequent Dispositions At any time during the probation, the court may issue a warrant for the arrest of a probationer for any serious violation of the conditions of probation. The probationer, once arrested and detained, shall be immediately be brought before the court for hearing of the violation charged. The defendant may be admitted to bail pending such hearing. In such case, the provisions regarding release on bail of persons charge with a crime shall be applicable to probationers arrested under these provisions. In the hearing, which shall be summary in nature, the probationer shall have the right to be informed of the violation charged and to adduce evidence in his favor. The court shall not be found by the technical rules of evidence but may inform itself of all the facts which are material and relevant to ascertain the veracity of the charge. The state shall be represented by a prosecuting officer in any contested hearing. If the violation is established, the court may revoke or continue his probation and modify the conditions thereof. If revoked, the court shall order the probationer to serve the sentence originally imposed. An order revoking the grant of probation or modifying the terms and conditions thereof shall not be appealable. Obligations of a Probationer 1. Present himself to the Probation Officer within 72 hours from receipt of probation order. 2. Report himself to the probation officer at least once a month during the period of probation. 3. Not to violate the conditions of his probation. Terms and conditions of Probation Two kinds of Conditions in Probation: 1) mandatory 2) Discretionary Mandatory or General Conditions 1. To present himself to the Probation Office for Supervision within 72 hours from receipt of the probation order. 2. To report to the assign probation officer at least once a month during the period of probation at such time and place as may be specified by the Probation Office. Discretionary or General Conditions 1. Cooperate with his program of probation treatment and supervision. 2. Meet his family responsibility. 3. Devote himself to a specific employment and not to change said employment without prior written approval of the Chief Probation and Parole Officer; 4. Undergo medical, or physiological, or clinic, or drug or psychiatric examinations and treatment and remain in a specified institution, when required for the purpose; 5. Comply with a program of payment civil liability of the offended party or his heirs, when required by the trial court of as embodied in its decision or resolution; 6. Pursue a prescribed secular study or vocational training; 7. Attend or reside in a facility established for instruction, schedule or residence of persons on probation; 8. Refrain from visiting houses of ill-repute; 9. Abstain from drinking intoxicating beverages to excess; 10. Permit the supervising probation officer on case or authorized social worker to visit his home and place of work; 11. Resides at premises approved by the trial court; and 12. Satisfy other conditions related to his rehabilitation into a useful citizen, which is not unduly restrictive of his liberty or incompatible with his freedom of conscience. In case of violation is committed by the probationer: The Court, after considering the nature and seriousness of the violations of the probation, may issue a warrant for the arrest of the probationer. He is then brought to the court immediately for hering, which is summary. If violation is established, the court may revoke or continue the probation and modify the conditions thereof. If revoked, the probationer shall be ordered to serve the sentence originally imposed and shall commit the probationer. The order of the court is not appealable. Termination of Probation Sec. 16. Termination of Probation- After the period of probation and upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the probation officer, the court may order the final discharge of the probationer upon finding that he has fulfilled the terms and conditions of his probation and thereupon the case is deemed terminated. Final Discharge of Probation and its Implications (Sec 3 of RA 10707
The final Discharge of the Probationer shall operate to
restore him all civil right lost or suspended as a result of his conviction and to totally extinguish his criminal liability as to the offense for which probation was granted. The probationer and the probation officer shall each be furnished with a copy of such order. Note: The suspension of the sentence however, has no bearing on the civil liability, which is separate and distinct from the criminal action. Probation is revocable before final discharge of the probationer by the court. Thus the expiration of the probation period alone does not automatically terminate probation. Probation is not conterminous with the period. There must be first issued by the court of an order of final discharge based on the report and recommendation of the probation officer. Only from such issuance can the case of the probationer be deemed terminated. Parole and Probation Administration (PPA) Parole and Probation Administration (PPA) Formerly known as Probation Administration Created by virtue of Presidential Decree 968, “The Probation Law of 1976” to administer the probation system. Under Executive Order 292, The Administrative Code of 1987” which was promulgated on November 23, 1989, the Probation Administration was renamed “Parole and Probation Administration” and given the added function of supervising prisoners who, after serving part of their sentence in jails are released on parole pardon with parole conditions. Vision A model component of the Philippine Correctional system that shall enhance the quality of life of its clients through multi-disciplinary programs and resources, an efficient organization, and a highly professional and committed workface in order to promote social justice and development. Mission To rehabilitate probationers, parolees and pardonees and promote their development as integral persons by utilizing innovative interventions and techniques which respect the dignity of man and recognize his divine destiny. Mandate
The Parole and Probation Administration is
mandated to conserve and/or redeem convicted offenders and prisoners who are under the probation or parole system. Goals The Administration’s program sets to achieve the following goals; Promote the reformation of criminal offenders and reduce the incidence of recidivism, and Provide a cheaper alternative to the institutional confinement of first-time offenders who are likely to respond to individualized, community base treatment programs. Functions To carry out these goals, the agency through its network of regional and field parole and probation offices performs the following functions: To administer the parole and probation system To exercise supervision over parolees, pardonees and probationers To promote the correction and rehabilitation of criminal offenders SERVICE OBJECTIVE 1.To provide the courts with relevant information and judicious recommendation for the selection of the offenders to be placed on probation. 2.To provide the Board of Pardons and Parole with necessary and relevant information which can be used in determining a prisoners fitness for parole or any form of executive clemency. 3. To provide the Dangerous Drug Board with pertinent information and prudent recommendations for the determinations of first-time minor drug offenders to be placed on suspended sentence. SERVICE OBJECTIVE 4. To affect the rehabilitation and integration of the probationers, parolees, pardonees and first-timer minor drug offenders as productive, law abiding and socially responsible members of the community. 5. To prevent recidivism and protect the community through a well-planned supervision of probationers, parolees, pardoned, and first time minor drug offenders. 6.To make use of innovative and financially and technically feasible projects to uplift the moral, spiritual and economic condition of probationers, parolees, pardonees, and first-time minor drug offenders by utilizing available community resources as much as possible. SERVICE OBJECTIVE 7. To continuously asses and improve professional performance in post-sentence, pre-parole/executive clemency and suspend sentence investigation case management and other related work. 8. To periodically review the Probation Law and its implementing rules so as to reconcile the same with the evolving realities in the field. 9.To assiduously observe and uphold the professional ethics in the delivery of service. The Indeterminate Sentence Law (ISLAW) (Act No. 4103 as amended) The basic mandate of the Indeterminate Sentence Law is the imposition of an indeterminate sentence which is comprised by a MINIMUM term and a MAXIMUM term. The court instead of imposing a “straight” penalty, the court must determine two penalties. It is indeterminate in the sense that after serving the MINIMUM, the convict may be released on Parole, or if he is not fitted for release, he shall continue serving his sentence until the end of the MAXIMUM.
Refer to article by Mathias Ruziwa, extracted from the herald, Thursday 24 November 2016, “Variation of contracts of employment”. a) Define the term constructive dismissal. b) Describe the types of contracts mentioned in the article.c) Discuss the macro-environmental factors that are currently affecting the working relations in Zimbabwe.