Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 85

HUMAN

BEHAVIOR
AND
VICTIMOLOGY
OVERVIEW ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
 Behavior- Refers to the action of an organism or system, usually in relation to its
environment, which include the other organism or system around as well as the
physical environment.
 Human behavior- Is a range of actions and mannerisms exhibited by humans in
conjunction with their environment, responding to various stimuli or inputs,
whether internal or external conscious or subconscious, overt or covert and
voluntary or involuntary.
 Human behavior is influenced by many factors, including:
Attitudes Culture Ethics Authority
Emotions Motivation Coercion Beliefs
Reasoning Values Religion Rapport
Persuasion Genetics
OVERVIEW ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
 Human Development- Is the process of a persons growth and maturation throughout their
lifespan, concerned with the creation of an environment where people are able to develop
their potential, while leading productive and creative lives in accordance with their interest
and needs.
 Development is about the expansion of choices people have in order to lead lives they value.
 Four (4) pillars of human development:
1. Equity-Is the idea that every person has the right to an education & health care, that there
must be fairness to all.
2. Sustainability – A view that every person has the right to earn a living that can sustain
him/her, while everyone has the right to access to goods, more evenly distributed among
population.
3. Production-an idea that people need more efficient social programs to be provided by
Government.
4. Empowerment- A view that people who are powerless, such as women (youth) to be given
power.
• Freud believed that the nature of the
conflicts among the id, ego, and superego
change over time as a person grows from
child to adult. Specifically, he maintained
that these conflicts progress through a
series of five basic stages, each with a
different focus: oral, anal, phallic, latency,
and genital.
• According to Freud, our personality
develops from a conflict between two
forces: our biological aggressive and
pleasure-seeking drives versus our internal
(socialized) control over these drives. Our
personality is the result of our efforts to
balance these two competing forces.
 Theories of Child (Human) Development
A. Personality Theory
I> Psychoanalytic theory by Sigmund Freud
The structure of personality is made up of three (3) major system: the id, the ego
and the super ego. Behavior is always the product of an inter action among these
three system; rarely does one system operate to the exclusion of the other two.
Level of awareness or topographical model by FREUD

1. The conscious level-It consist of whatever sensation and experiences persons


are aware of a given moment of time.
2. The preconscious level- This domain is sometimes called “available memory”
that encompasses all experiences that are not conscious at the moment, but
can be easily retrieve into awareness either spontaneously or with a minimum
of effort.
3. The unconscious level – It is the deepest and major stratum of the human mind,
the storehouse for primitive instinctual drives, plus emotions and memories that
are so threatening to the conscious mind that they have been repressed, or
unconsciously pushed to the unconscious mind. (Example are the forgotten
trauma in childhood, or repressed sexual desires of which you are unaware.
a. Oedipus complex-
It refers To an instance Psychosexual theory asserts
where in boys Build That we are born with two (2)
up a warm and loving Basic instincts:
Relationship with 1. Eros-Includes sex drives ,
mothers. Hunger and thirst. (Greek God
of Love).
b. Electra complex- It 2. Thanatos- Destructive
refers to an occasion motives such as hostility,
where in girls aggression and strive for death.
experience an intense
emotional attachment These drives highly influence
for their fathers The personality of a person.
TRAIT THEORY
• Trait theory attempts to learn and explain the trait that make up personality, the difference
between people in terms of their personal characteristics, and how they relate to actual behavior.
• Trait refers to the characteristics of an individual describing a habitual way of behaving, thinking,
and feeling. Trait approach identifies where a person might lie along a continuum of various
personality characteristics.
Kinds of trait by GORDON ALLPORT
1. Common traits These are personality traits that are shared by most member of a particular
culture.
2. Individual Traits-These are personality traits that define a persons unique individual qualities.
3. Cardinal Traits- Personality traits that are so basic that all persons activities relate to these. It is a
powerful and dominating behavioral type of offenders may be due to the deficiency in the primitive
emotion of love and an excuse of the instinct of hate.
4. Central trait- These are the core traits that characterize an individuals personality , they are the
major traits of our personalities that are generalize & enduring, they are building blocks of our
personality.
5. Secondary traits- These are the traits that are inconsistent or relatively superficial, less generalize
and far less enduring that affects are behaviors in specific circumstances.
FIVE 5 FACTORS THEORY - MOST WIDELY ACCEPTED THEORY FROM GOLDBERG
PERSONALITY TRAITS BY Hans Eysenck
Extrovert – It refers to a person
That is sociable, outgoing and active.

Introvert- It refers to a person


That is withdrawn, quiet and
Introspective. Emotionally
Stable

Emotionally unstable- It is a trait Emotionally


That is being anxious, excitable and Unstable
Easily disturbed. (Neurotic)
PERSONALITY TRAITS BY Hans Eysenck
• Eysenck theorized that criminality and anti social behaviour are both
positively and causally related to high levels of psychotism, extroversion,
and neuroticism.
• The theory says that the extrovert and possibly also in people high on
the psychoticism scale, biologically determined low degrees of arousal
and arousablity lead to impulsive, risk taking and sensation-seeking
behaviour that increase the level of cortical (Brain) arousal to a more
acceptable and enjoyable amount.
• Eysenck did find that extroverts experience cortical under arousal,
prefer higher levels of stimulation, and are less responsive to
punishment- they therefore do not learn behavioural alternatives with
the use of disciplinary action.
• What is temperament – Refers to the fundamental groundwork of
character , generally presumed to be biologically determined and
existent early in life, inclusive of traits like emotional reactiveness,
energy level, reaction tempo and motivation to explore.
Four types of temperament
Melancholic - Sad, gloomy
Choleric - Hot tempered, irritable
Phlegmatic - Sluggish, calm
Sanguine - Cheerful, hopeful
KINDS OF TRAITS BY: Gordon Allport
 Common traits-These are personality traits that are shared by most
members of Particular culture.

 Individual traits- These are personality traits that define a persons unique
individual Qualities.

 Cardinal traits- These personality traits are so basics that all persons
activities relate to these. It is a powerful and dominating behaviour
predisposition That provides the pivotal point in a persons entire life.
Very few have this.
 Central traits- These are the core traits that characterize an individuals
Personality. Central traits are the major characteristics of our personalities
That are quite generalized and enduring. They form the building blocks
of our personality.

 Secondary traits- These are traits that are inconsistent or relatively


Superficial, less generalized and far less enduring that affects our behaviour
In specific circumstances.
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCHES ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY

• August Aichorn- In his book “wayward youth” (1925) said that the cause of the crime
and delinquency is the faulty development of the child during the first few years of
his life.
• The child as a human being normally follows only his pleasure impulse instinctive.
• As child grows up, and find some restriction to these pleasure impulses which he
must control, otherwise, he suffer from faulty ego development and become
delinquent. Aichorn concluded that many of the offenders with whom he had work
has under developed consciences, thus he identified two (2) categories:
1. Those with fully developed consciences but identified with their criminal parents.
2. Those who had been allowed to do whatever they like by over indulgent parents.
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCHES ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY
Cyril Burt- His book entitled “ Young & Delinquent in (1925) fashioned the theory of General
emotionality, according to him many offenses at can be traced to either in excess or
deficiency of a particular instinct which accounts for the tendency of many criminals to be
weak willed or easily led. Fear and absconding may be due to the impulse of fear.
• Callous type of offenders may be due to the deficiency in the primitive emotion of love and an
excuse of the instinct of hate.
William Healy - his book entitled “Individual Delinquency” in 1916 claimed that crime is an
expression of the mental content of the individual.
• Frustration of the individual causes emotional discomfort, personality demands removal of
pain, and pain is eliminated by substitute behaviour, that is crime delinquency of the
individual.
• Healy and Bonner in 1936 conducted study of 105 pairs of brothers where one is a persistent
offender and the other a non offender . It was found that only 19 of the offenders and 30 of
the non offenders had experience a good quality family conditions.
• These findings suggested that circumstances within a household maybe favourable for one
child but not the sibling. It then proposed that the latter had not made an emotional
attachment to good parent, hence impeding the development of superego
Walter Bromberg- In his book entitled “Crime and the Mind” printed in 1946
mentioned that criminality is the result of emotional immaturity. A person is
emotionally matured if he has learned to control his emotion effectively and who lives
at peace with himself and harmony with the standard of conduct which are
acceptable to society. An emotionally immature person rebel against rules and
regulations, engage in usual activities and experiences a feeling of guilt due to
inferiority complex.
Psychosocial theory of development by Erik Erikson
Eriksson was best known for his theory on social development of human beings, and
for coining the phrase ”Identity Crisis” the theory describes eight (8) stages through
which a healthy developing human should pass from infancy to late adulthood. each
stage the person confronts, and hopefully master, new challenges.
Each stage builds on the successful completion of earlier stages. The challenges of
stages not successfully completed may be expected to reappear as problems in the
future.
 Jean Piaget theory of cognitive development suggest that children move through 4 different stages of
mental development. His theory focuses not only on understanding how children acquire knowledge, but
also on understanding the nature of intelligence.
 Piaget believe that children take an active role in the learning process, acting much like Scientist, make
observation and learn about the world. As kids interact with the world around them they continually add
new knowledge, build upon existing knowledge and adapt Previously held ideas to accommodate new
information.
LEVEL OF AWARENESSOR TOPOGRAPHICAL MODEL (By Sigmund Freud)

It consist of whatever sensation and


experiences persons are aware of at
A given moment of time

It is the deepest and major


Stratum of the human mind;
the storehouse for primitive Its called available memory that
instinctual drives plus emotion encompasses all experiences that are not
and memories that are too Conscious at the moment, but can be easily
threatening to the conscious Retrieve into awareness either
mind that they have been spontaneously or with a minimum of effort
repressed or unconsciously
pushed to the unconscious
mind. (e.g. Forgotten trauma
in childhood, or repressed
Sexual desires of which you
are unaware
TRAITS THEORY
• Traits theory - attempt to learn and explain the traits that make-up
personality, the difference between people in terms of their personal
characteristics, and how they relate to actual behaviour.
• Trait refers to the characteristics of an individual, describing a habitual
way of behaving, thinking, feeling, trait approach identifies where a
person might LIE along a continuum of various personality Characteristics.
• Example: CHRIST alike we refer to someone who can sacrifice his own
good for the sake of others. Hitler- ruthlessness, while Mother Teresa
trait is selflessness.
• Example of central trait-Outgoing, sentimental, attentive, sociable, or
vivacious in the writing.
KINDS OF TRAITS BY: Gordon Allport
 Common traits-These are personality traits that are shared by most
members of Particular culture.

 Individual traits- These are personality traits that define a persons unique
individual Qualities.

 Cardinal traits- These personality traits are so basics that all persons
activities relate to these. It is a powerful and dominating behaviour
predisposition That provides the pivotal point in a persons entire life.
Very few have this.
 Central traits- These are the core traits that characterize an individuals
Personality. Central traits are the major characteristics of our personalities
That are quite generalized and enduring. They form the building blocks
of our personality.

 Secondary traits- These are traits that are inconsistent or relatively


Superficial, less generalized and far less enduring that affects our behaviour
In specific circumstances.
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCHES ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY

• August Aichorn- In his book “wayward youth” (1925) said that the cause of the crime
and delinquency is the faulty development of the child during the first few years of
his life.
• The child as a human being normally follows only his pleasure impulse instinctive.
• As child grows up, and find some restriction to these pleasure impulses which he
must control, otherwise, he suffer from faulty ego development and become
delinquent. Aichorn concluded that many of the offenders with whom he had work
has under developed consciences, thus he identified two (2) categories:
1. Those with fully developed consciences but identified with their criminal parents.
2. Those who had been allowed to do whatever they like by over indulgent parents.
Proverbs 13:24
"Those who spare the rod of discipline hate their children.
Those who love their children care enough to discipline them."
Love your children don't forget to discipline them.
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCHES ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY
Cyril Burt- His book entitled “ Young & Delinquent in (1925) fashioned the theory of General
emotionality, according to him many offenses at can be traced to either in excess or
deficiency of a particular instinct which accounts for the tendency of many criminals to be
weak willed or easily led. Fear and absconding may be due to the impulse of fear.
• Callous type of offenders may be due to the deficiency in the primitive emotion of love and an
excuse of the instinct of hate.
William Healy - his book entitled “Individual Delinquency” in 1916 claimed that crime is an
expression of the mental content of the individual.
• Frustration of the individual causes emotional discomfort, personality demands removal of
pain, and pain is eliminated by substitute behaviour, that is crime delinquency of the
individual.
• Healy and Bonner in 1936 conducted study of 105 pairs of brothers where one is a persistent
offender and the other a non offender . It was found that only 19 of the offenders and 30 of
the non offenders had experience a good quality family conditions.
• These findings suggested that circumstances within a household maybe favourable for one
child but not the sibling. It then proposed that the latter had not made an emotional
attachment to good parent, hence impeding the development of superego
Walter Bromberg- In his book entitled “Crime and the Mind” printed in 1946
mentioned that criminality is the result of emotional immaturity. A person is
emotionally matured if he has learned to control his emotion effectively and who lives
at peace with himself and harmony with the standard of conduct which are
acceptable to society. An emotionally immature person rebel against rules and
regulations, engage in usual activities and experiences a feeling of guilt due to
inferiority complex.
Psychosocial theory of development by Erik Erikson
Eriksson was best known for his theory on social development of human beings, and for
coining the phrase ”Identity Crisis” the theory describes eight (8) stages through which
a healthy developing human should pass from infancy to late adulthood. each stage
the person confronts, and hopefully master, new challenges.
Each stage builds on the successful completion of earlier stages. The challenges of
stages not successfully completed may be expected to reappear as problems in the
future.
Erikson stages of human development
2. Cognitive Model. The cognitive approach assumes that a person’s thoughts
are responsible for their behavior. The model deals with how information is
processed in the brain and the impact of this on behavior. The basic
assumptions are:
a. Maladaptive behavior is caused by faulty and irrational cognitions.
b. It is the way you think about a problem, rather than the problem itself it
causes mental disorder.
c. Individuals can overcome mental disorders by learning to use more
appropriate cognitions.
d. The individual is an active processor of information. How a person, perceives,
anticipates and evaluates events rather than the events themselves, which
will have an impact on behavior. This is generally believed to be an automatic
process; in other words, we do not really think about it.
3. Medical or Biological Model. The medical model of psychopathology
believes that disorders have an organic or physical causes. The focus of
this approach is on genetics, neurotransmitters, neurophysiology,
neuroanatomical, biochemistry etc.

For example, in terms of biochemistry – the dopamine hypothesis


argues that elevated levels of dopamine are related to symptoms of
schizophrenia.

The approach argues that mental disorders are related to the physical
structure and functioning of the brain. For example, differences in brain
structure (abnormalities in the frontal and pre-frontal cortex, enlarged
ventricles) have been identified in people with schizophrenia.
4. Psychodynamic Model. As mentioned earlier, the main assumptions include Freud’s belief that
abnormality came from the psychological causes rather that the physical causes, that unresolved conflicts
between the id, ego and superego can all contribute to abnormality, for example:

a. Weak ego. Well-adjusted people have a strong ego to cope with the demands of both the id and the
superego by allowing each to express itself at appropriate times. If, however, the ego is weakened, then
either the id or the superego, whichever is stronger, may dominate the personality.
b. Unchecked Id Impulses. If id impulses are unchecked, they may be expressed in self-destructive and
immoral behavior, this may lead to disorders such as conduct disorders in childhood and psychopathic
[dangerously abnormal] behavior in adulthood.
c. Too Powerful Superego. A superego that is too powerful, and therefore too harsh and inflexible in its
moral values, will restrict the id to such an extent that the person will be deprived of even socially
acceptable pleasures. According to Freud this would create neurosis, which could be expressed in the
symptoms of anxiety disorders, such as phobia and obsessions.
Freud also believed that early childhood experiences and unconscious motivation were responsible for
disorders.
Identification of Abnormal Behavior
1. Deviation from Statistical Norm. The word abnormal means away from
the norm. Many population facts are measured such as height, weight
and intelligence. Most of the people fall within the middle range of
intelligence, but a few are abnormally stupid. But according to this
definition, a person who is extremely intelligent should be classified as
abnormal. Examples are:
a. Intelligence. It is statistically abnormal for a person to get a score about
145 on an IQ test or to get a score below 55, but only the lowest score is
considered abnormal.
b. Anxiety. A person who is anxious all the time or has a high level of
anxiety and someone who almost never feels anxiety are all considered
to be a normal.
2.Deviation from Social Norm. Every culture has certain standards for acceptable
behavior; behavior that deviates from the standard is considered to be abnormal
behavior. But those standards can change with time and vary from one society to
another.
3. Maladaptive Behavior. This third criterion is how the behavior affects the well-
being of the individual and/or social group. A man who attempts suicide or a
paranoid individual who tries to assassinate national leaders are illustrations under
this criterion. The two aspects of maladaptive behavior are:
a. Maladaptive to One’s self. It refers to the inability of a person to reach goals or
to adapt the demands of life.
b. Maladaptive to Society. It refers to a person’s obstruction or disruption to
social group functioning.
4. Personal Distress. The fourth criterion considers abnormality in terms of the
individual’s subjective feelings, personal distress, rather than his behavior. Most
people commonly diagnosed as ‘mentally ill’ feel miserable, anxious, depressed
and many suffer from insomnia.
5. Failure to Function Adequately. Under this definition, a person is
considered abnormal if they are unable to cope with the demands of
everyday life. They may be unable to perform the behaviors necessary for
day-to-day living e.g. self-care, hold down a job, interact meaningfully with
others, make themselves understood etc. The following characteristics that
define failure to function adequately:
a. suffering,
b. maladaptiveness (dangerous to self),
c. vividness and unconventionality (stand out),
d. unpredictably and loss control,
e. irrationality/incomprehensibility,
f. causes observer discomfort, and
g. violates moral/social standards
5. Failure to Function Adequately. Under this definition, a person is
considered abnormal if they are unable to cope with the demands of
everyday life. They may be unable to perform the behaviors necessary for
day-to-day living e.g. self-care, hold down a job, interact meaningfully with
others, make themselves understood etc. The following characteristics that
define failure to function adequately:
a. suffering,
b. maladaptiveness (dangerous to self),
c. vividness and unconventionality (stand out),
d. unpredictably and loss control,
e. irrationality/incomprehensibility,
f. causes observer discomfort, and
g. violates moral/social standards
6. Deviation from Ideal Mental Health. Under this definition, rather than defining what is
abnormal, we define what is normal/ideal and anything that deviates from this is
regarded as abnormal. This requires us to decide on the characteristics we consider
necessary to mental health. The six criteria by which mental health could be measured
are as follows:
a. positive view of the self,
b. capability for growth and development,
c. autonomy and independence,
d. accurate perception of reality,
e. positive friendships and relationships, and
f. environmental mastery (able to meet the varying demands of day-to-day situations).

According to this approach, the more of these criteria are satisfied, the healthier
the individual is.
Symptoms of Abnormal Behavior
1. Long Periods of Discomfort. This could be anything as simple as worrying about a calculus test or
grieving the death of a loved one. This distress is related to a real, related, or threatened event
and passes with time. When such distressing feelings, however, persist for an extended period of
time and seem to be unrelated to events surrounding the person, they would be considered
abnormal and could suggest a psychological disorder.
2. Impaired Functioning. Here, a distinction must be made between simply a passing period of
inefficiency and prolonged inefficiency which seems unexplainable. For instance, a very brilliant
person consistently fails in his classes or someone who constantly changes his jobs for no
apparent reason.
3. Bizarre Behavior. Bizarre behavior that has no rational basis seems to indicate that the individual
id confused. The psychoses frequently result in hallucinations (baseless sensory perceptions) or
delusions (beliefs which are patently false et held as true by the individual).
4. Disruptive Behavior. Disruptive behavior means impulsive, apparently uncontrollable behavior
that disrupts the lives of others or deprives them of their human rights on a regular basis. This
type of behaviour is characteristic of a severe psychological disorder. An example, of this is the
antisocial personality disorder.
Lesson 3: Mental Disorder
What is Mental Disorder? Mental Disorder refers to the significant impairment in psychological
functioning.
A mental disorder, also called a mental illness or psychiatric disorder, is a behavioral or mental
pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal function.
According to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) –IV, a mental disorder is
psychological syndrome or pattern which is associated with distress (e.g. via a painful symptom),
disability (impairment in one or more important areas of functioning), increased risk of death, or
causes a significant loss of autonomy; however it excludes normal responses such as grief from loss
of a loved one, and also excludes deviant behavior for political, religious, or societal reasons not
arising from a dysfunction in the individual.
In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) redefined mental disorders in the DSM-5 as
“syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual’s cognition, emotion
regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental
processes underlying mental functioning.
What is Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders?
It is better known as the DSM-IV, the manual is published by the APA and
covers all mental health disorders for both children and adults. It also lists
known causes of these disorders, statistics in terms of gender, age at onset,
and prognosis as well as some research concerning the optimal treatment
approaches. Mental Health Professionals use this manual when working
with patients in order to better understand their illness and potential
treatment and to help 3rd party payers (e.g. insurance) understand the
needs of the patient. The book is typically considered the ‘bible’ for any
professional who makes psychiatric diagnoses in the United States and
many other countries. Much of the diagnostic information on these pages
is gathered from the DSM IV. equivocal
What is American Psychiatric Association (APA)?
It is a medical specialty society with over 35,000 US and international
member physicians who “work together to ensure humane care and
effective treatment for all persons with mental disorder, including mental
retardation and substance-related disorders. It is the voice and conscience
of modern psychiatry. Its vision is a society that has available, accessible
quality psychiatric diagnosis and treatment.” APA is the oldest national
medical specialty society in the US.
Relationship between Mental Disorder and Crime
The relationship between mental disorder and crime is an issue of significant empirical
complexity. It has been subject of extensive research, using both cross-sectional and longitudinal
designs and including samples of the general population, birth cohorts, psychiatric patients, and
incarcerated offenders. Nevertheless, findings have been equivocal. On the other hand, the
following are several results of studies that have found a relationship between mental disorder
and crime:
1. The risk of criminal behavior was significantly higher among subjects with mental disorders,
regardless of the socioeconomic status of the childhood family. In particular, the higher risk
for violent behavior was associated with alcohol-induced psychoses and with schizophrenia
with coexisting substance abuse.
2. A review on the five epidemiology investigations of post-Second World War birth cohorts,
came to the conclusion that persons who develop major mental disorders are at increased risk
across the lifespan of committing crimes. However, this increased risk may be limited to
generations of persons with major mental disorders born in the late 1940s, 1950s and 1960s,
as they do not have received appropriate mental health care.
3. After examining data from national hospital and crime registers in Sweden,
researchers found that the overall population-attributable risk fraction of patient
was 5%, indicating that patients with severe mental disorder commit one in 20
violent crimes.

4. A comparison on Swiss in-patients with the general population resulted that


patients were more frequently registered in all crime categories, although there
were differences between the diagnostic groups: while alcoholics and drug users
of both sexes had a significantly higher criminality rate, a higher rate was found
among female, but not male patients suffering schizophrenia or related disorders.

5. Finally, homicidal behavior appears to have a statistical association with


schizophrenia and antisocial personality disorder.
On the other hand, there are also studies that discard any relationship between mental disorder
and crime. They are as follows:
1. In a study which examined the ability of personal demographic, criminal history, and clinical
variables to predict recidivism in mentally disordered offenders in the United Kingdom,
researchers found that reconviction in mentally disordered offenders can be predicted using the
same criminogenic variables that are predictive in offenders without mental disorders.
2. Researchers analyzed the relationship between violence and substance abuse among patients
with chronic mental disorder and found that major mental disorder alone, with no history of
alcohol or drug abuse, was associated with a considerably lower risk of violence. Overall, the
study showed no difference in the rate of violence between patients with major mental disorders
and patients with other diagnoses.
3. Other studies suggest that the diagnosis of schizophrenia and delusional disorder, contrary to
previous findings, do not predict higher rates of violence among recently discharged psychiatric
patients.
4. Similarly, researchers found that crime rate among male schizophrenia patients was almost the
same as that in the general male population. However, the crime rate among females was twice
that of the general female population, so the overall results of the study were mixed.
What is Mental Retardation (MR)?
MR is a condition of limited ability in which an individual has a low Intelligence
Quotient (IQ), usually below 70 on a traditional intelligence test, and has difficulty
adapting to everyday life; he/she first exhibited these characteristics during the so-
called developmental period –by age 18.
MR is a developmental disability that first appears in children under the age of 18.
It is defined as a level of intellectual functioning (as measured by standard
intelligence tests) that is well below average and results in significant limitations in
the person’s daily living skills (adaptive functioning). Adaptive skills are a term that
refers to skills needed for daily life. Such skills include the ability to produce and
understand language (communication); home-living skills; use of community
resources; health, safety, leisure. Self-care, and social skills; self-direction;
functional academic skills (reading, writing, and arithmetic); and job-related skills.
Four Different Degrees of Mental Retardation
1. Mild Mental Retardation. Approximately 85% of the mentally retarded population is in the mild
retarded category. Their IQ score ranges from 50-70, and they can often acquire academic skills
up to about the sixth-grade level. They can become fairly self-sufficient and, in some cases, live
independently, with community and social support.
2. Moderate Mental Retardation. About 10% of the mentally retarded population is considered
moderately retarded. Moderately retarded persons have IQ scores ranging from 35-55. They
can carry out work and self-care tasks with moderate supervision. They typically acquire
communication skills in childhood and are able to live and function successfully within the
community in such supervised environments as group homes.
3. Severe Mental Retardation. About 3-4% of the mentally retarded population is severely
retarded. Severely retarded persons have IQ scores of 20-40. They may master very basic self-
care skills and some communication skills. Many severely retarded individuals are able to live in
a group home.
4. Profound Mental Retardation. Only 1-2% of the mentally retarded population is classified as
profoundly retarded. Profoundly retarded individuals have IQ scores under 20-25. They may
able to develop basic self-care and communication skills with appropriate support and training.
Their retardation is often caused by an accompanying neurological disorder. Profoundly
retarded people need a high level of structure and supervision.
Causes and Symptoms of Mental Retardation
Low IQ scores and limitations in adaptive skills are the hallmark of mental
retardation. Aggression, self-injury, and mood disorders are sometimes associated
with the disability.
The severity of the symptoms and the age at which they first appear depend on the
cause. Children who are mentally retarded reach developmental milestone
significantly later than expected, if at all.
If retardation is caused by chromosomal or other genetic disorders, it is often
apparent from infancy. If retardation is caused by childhood illnesses or injuries,
learning and adaptive skills that were once easy may suddenly become difficult or
impossible to master. In about 40% of cases, the cause of mental retardation cannot
be found.
Biological and environmental factors that can cause mental retardation include
the following:
1. Genetic Factors. About 30% of cases of mental retardation is caused by
hereditary factors. Mental retardation may be caused by an inherited genetic
abnormality, such as fragile X syndrome.
What is Fragile X Syndrome?
It is defect in the chromosome that determines sex, is the most common
inherited cause of mental retardation. Single-gene defects such as
phenylketonuria (PKU) and other inborn errors of metabolism may also cause
mental retardation if they are not discovered and treated early. An accident or
mutation in genetic development may also cause retardation. Example of such
accidents are development of an extra chromosome 18 (trisomy 18) and Down
syndrome. Down syndrome, also called mongolism or trisomy 21, is caused by
an abnormality in the development of chromosome 21. It is the most common
genetic cause of mental retardation.
1. Prenatal Illness and Issues. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) affects one in 3,000 children in
Western countries. It is caused by the mother’s heavy drinking during the first twelve
weeks (trimester) of pregnancy. Some studies have shown that even moderate alcohol use
during pregnancy may cause learning disabilities in children. Drug abuse and cigarette
smoking during pregnancy have also been liked to mental retardation.

Maternal infections and such illnesses as glandular disorders, rubella, toxoplasmosis, and
cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection may cause mental retardation. When the mother has
high blood pressure (hypertension) or blood poisoning (toxemia), the flow of oxygen to
the fetus may be reduced, causing brain damage and mental retardation.

Birth defects that cause physical deformities of the head, brain, and central nervous
system frequently cause mental retardation.
Neural tube defect, for example, is a birth defect in which the neural tube that forms the
spinal cord does not close completely. This defect may cause children to develop an
accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid inside the skull (hydrocephalus). Hydrocephalus can
cause learning impairment by putting pressure on the brain.
2. Childhood Illnesses and Injuries. Hyperthyroidism, whooping cough, chickenpox,
measles, and Hib disease (a bacterial infection) may cause mental retardation if they
are not treated adequately. An infection of the membrane covering the brain
(meningitis) or an inflammatory of the brain itself (encephalitis) can cause swelling
that in turn may cause brain damage and mental retardation. Traumatic brain injury
caused by a blow to the head or by violent shaking of the upper body may also
cause brain damage and mental retardation in children.

3. Environmental Factors. Ignored or neglected infants who are not provided with
the mental and physical stimulation required for normal development may suffer
irreversible learning impairment. Children who live in poverty and suffer from
malnutrition, unhealthy living conditions, abuse, and improper or inadequate
medical care are at a higher risk. Exposure to lead or mercury can also cause mental
retardation. Many children have developed lead poisoning from eating the flaking
lead-based paint often found in older buildings.
Intelligence Test for Learning Abilities and Intellectual Functioning
1. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
2. Wechsler Intelligence Scales
3. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence
4. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
Prevention of Mental Retardation
Immunization against disease such as measles and Hib prevent many of the illnesses that can
cause mental retardation. In addition, all children should undergo routine developmental
screening as part of their pediatric care. Screening is particularly critical for those children who
may be neglected or undernourished or may live in disease-producing conditions. Newborn
screening and immediate treatment for PKU and hyperthyroidism can usually catch these
disorders early enough to prevent retardation.
Good prenatal care can also help prevent retardation. Pregnant women should be educated
about the risks of alcohol consumption and the need to maintain good nutrition during
pregnancy. Such tests as amniocentesis and ultrasonography can determine whether a fetus is
developing normally in the womb.
Lesson 4: Criminal Behavior and Intelligence
What is Criminal Behavior?
Criminal Behavior refers to a behavior which is criminal in nature; a behavior which
violates a law. Thus, the moment a person violates the law, he has already
committed [exhibited] criminal behavior. Criminal behavior refers to conduct of an
offender that leads to and including the commission of an unlawful act.
According to Goldoozian, for human behavior to be considered a crime, three
elements are necessary to be present:
1. Legally, the criminal act should be prohibited by law.
2. Materially, the criminal act should be executed or realized.
3. Spiritually, the criminal act should be accompanied by criminal intention or guilt.
Origins of Criminal Behavior: Criminological Perspective
1. Biological Factor. Heredity is a factor implies that criminal acts are unavoidable, inevitable
consequences of the bad seed or bad blood. It emphasizes genetic predisposition toward
antisocial and criminal conduct as evidenced by some studies and theories such as: Born
Criminal (Cesare Lombrose), Physique and Somatotype (Ernst Kretschmer & William Sheldon),
and Juke and Kallikak (Richard Dugdale & Henry Goddard).
2. Personality Disorder Factor. Personality disorder factor refers to an act that exhibits a
pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others that begins in childhood
or early adolescence and continues into adulthood such as Anti-Social Personality Disorder.
3. Humanistic Factor. It identifies personal responsibility and feelings of self-acceptance as the
key causes of differences in personality. This perspective focuses on how humans have evolved
and adapted behaviors required for survival against various environmental pressures over the
long course of evolution.
4. Behavioral or Social Learning Factor. As mentioned above, behavioral/social learning
approach explains consistent behavior patterns as the rest of conditioning and expectations.
This emphasizes the role of environmental in shaping behavior.
What is Behavioral Personality Theory?
It is a model of personality that emphasizes the learning and observable behavior.
What is Social Learning Theory?
It is an explanation of personality that combines learning principles, cognition, and the effects of social
relationships.
What is Self-reinforcement?
This is the praising or rewarding oneself for having made a particular response
What is Identification?
It is a feeling from which one is emotionally connected to a person and a way of seeing oneself as
himself or herself. The child admires adults who love and care for him or her and this encourages
imitation.
Specifically, the following are some criminological learning theories under the behavioral or social
learning factor:
a. Differential Association Theory by Edwin Sutherland
b. Imitation Theory by Gabriel Tarde
c. Identification Theory by Daniel Glaser
5, Cognitive Approach. Cognitive approach looks at differences in the way people process information to
explain differences in behavior. This perspective emphasizes the role of mental processes that underlie
behavior.
Intelligence and Criminality
What is Human Intelligence?
Human intelligence generally points to at least three characteristics. First intelligence is best
understood as a compilation of brain-based cognitive abilities. According to 52 eminent intelligence
researchers, intelligence reflects “a very general mental capability that, among other things,
involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas,
learn quickly and learn from experience”.
The earliest casual explanation, popular during the early 1900s, portrayed criminals as so
feebleminded and mentally deficient that they could neither distinguish right from wrong nor
resist criminal impulses. This feeblemindedness hypothesis, however, lost favor long ago as it
became clear that few criminals are actually mentally deficient and most recognize, though may
not follow, behavioral norms. A more recent, and more compelling, casual explanation emphasizes
the importance of intelligence - especially intelligence – during childhood socialization. The
socialization of children involves constant verbal communication and comprehension of abstract
symbols; therefore, children with poor verbal and cognitive skills have greater difficulty completing
the socialization process, which puts them at risk of under controlled, antisocial behavior.
Empirical studies overall have supported this developmental hypothesis, and it fits with the
especially strong correlation between verbal IQ and crime (see table below).
A final casual explanation links IQ to crime through school performance. Less intelligent students do
less well in school, which results in academic frustration. This frustration, in turn, weakens their
attachment and commitment to schooling and a weakened bond to school, as per social control
theory, allows for more criminal behavior. This school performance hypothesis have received strong
support from empirical studies, and it is probably the most widely accepted explanation of the IQ-
crime correlation.
Criminal Law and Intelligence
What is the McNaughton (M’Naghten) Rule?
In 1724 an English court maintained that a man was not responsible for an act if “he does not know
what he is doing, no more…. a wild beast”. Modern standards of legal responsibility, however, have
been based on the McNaughton decision of 1843.
The formal insanity defense has its beginnings in 1843, when Daniel McNaughton tried to kill
Robert Peel, the British prime minister (he shot and killed his secretary instead). AT his trial,
McNaughton testified that he believed that the British government was plotting against him, and he
was acquitted of murder. The McNaughton Rule requires that a criminal defendant:
1. Not known what he was doing at the time; or
2. Not known that his actions were wrong (because of his delusional belief, McNaughton thought he
was defending himself)
The Rule created a presumption of sanity, unless the defense proved “at the time of committing the
act, the accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to
know the nature and quality of the act he was doing or, if he did know it, that he did not know what
he was doing was wrong. “This rule was adopted in the US, and the distinction of knowing right
from wrong remained the basis for most decisions of legal insanity.
What is the Durham Rule?
It is also called as the Product Test which states that, “an accused is not
criminally responsible if his unlawful act is the product of mental disease
or mental defect.” Some States in USA added to their statues this doctrine
which also known as irresistible impulse recognizing some ill individuals
may respond correctly, but may be unable to control their behavior.

The Durham Rule was adopted in USA in 1954 but was overturned in
1972, largely because its ambiguous reference to “mental disease or
defect” places undue emphasis on subjective judgments by psychiatrists,
and can easily lead to a “battle of the experts.”
What ALI “Substantial Capacity” Test?
Many states in USA now adopt a version of guidelines set out by the
American Law Institute (ALI) in 1962, which allows the insanity defense if,
by virtue of mental illness, the defendant:
1. Lacks the ability to understand the meaning of his/her act; or
2. Cannot control his/her impulses (sometimes known as the irresistible
impulse test).
The Test was integrated by the ALI in its Model Penal Code Test, which
improved on the McNaughton rule and irresistible impulse tests. The new
rule stated that a person is not responsible for his criminal act if, as a
result of the mental disease or defect, he lacks substantial capacity to
appreciate the criminality of his act or to conform his conduct to the
requirements of the law.
Still, this test has been criticized for its use of ambiguous words like “substantial
capacity” and “appreciate” as there would be differences in expert testimonies
whether the accused’s degree of awareness was sufficient. Objections were also
made to the exclusion of psychopaths or persons whose abnormalities are
manifested only by repeated criminal conduct. Critics observed that psychopaths
cannot be deterred and thus underserving of punishment.
In 1984, however, the U.S. Congress repudiated this test in favor of the
McNaughton style statutory formulation. It enacted the Comprehensive Crime
Control Act which made the appreciation test the law applicable in all federal
courts. The test is similar to McNaughton as it relies on the cognitive test. The
accused is not required to prove lack of control as in the ALI test. The
appreciation test shifted the burden of proof to the defense, limited the scope of
expert testimony, eliminated the defense of diminished capacity and provided for
commitment of accused found to be insane.
Criminal Law and Intelligence in the Philippines
In the Philippines, the courts have established a more stringent criterion for insanity to be
exempting as it is required that there must be a complete deprivation of intelligence in
committing the act, i.e., the accused is deprived of reason; he acted without the least discernment
because there is a complete of absence of the power to discern, or that there is a total deprivation
of the will. Mere abnormality of the mental facilities will not exclude imputability.
The issue of insanity is a question of fact for insanity is a condition of the mind, not susceptible of
the usual means of proof. As no man can know what is going on in the mind of another, the state
or condition of a person’s mind can only be measure and judged by his behavior. Establishing the
insanity of an accused requires opinion testimony which may be given by a witness who is
intimately acquainted with the accused, by a witness who has rational basis to conclude that the
accused was insane based on the witness’ own perception of the accused, or by a witness who is
qualified as an expert, such as psychiatrist. The testimony or proof of the accused’s insanity must
relate to the time preceding or coetaneous with the commission of the offense with which he is
charged.
The Revised Penal Code
Article 12 of the code exempts a person from criminal liability in consideration of intelligence.
They are as follows:
Paragraph 1: Any person who has committed a crime while the said person was imbecile or
insane during the commission.
When the imbecile or an insane person has committed an act which the law defines as a felony
(delito), the court shall order his confinement in one of the hospitals or asylums established for
persons thus afflicted, which he shall not be permitted to leave without first obtaining the
permission of the same court.

Suggested Readings:
1. People of the Philippines vs. Tibon, G.R. No. 188320, June 29, 2010
2. People of the Philippines vs. Roger Austria Y Navarro (alias Bernie), G.R. No. 111517-19, July 31,
1996
3. People of the Philippines vs. Fernando Madarang Y Magno, G.R. No. 132319, May 12, 2000
4. People of the Philippines vs. Celestino Bonoan Y Cruz, G.R. No. L-45130, February 17, 1937
Paragraph 2: A person over nine years of age and under fifteen, unless he has
acted with discernment, in which case, such minor shall be proceeded against in
accordance with the provisions of Art. 80 of the Code.
Paragraph 3: Any person having an age of 9 years old and below.
Suggested Reading:
1. People of the Philippines vs. Morales, G.R. No. 148518, April 15, 2004

Note:
In connection to paragraph 2 and 3, Republic Act No. 9344 otherwise known as
Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006, as amended by Republic Act 10609,
raised the criminal exemption from 9-15 years old. In addition, a person of this
age is totally exempted, whether he/she acted with or without discernment
during the commission of crime.
KINDS OF TRAITS BY: Gordon Allport
 Common traits-These are personality traits that are shared by most
members of Particular culture.

 Individual traits- These are personality traits that define a persons unique
individual Qualities.

 Cardinal traits- These personality traits are so basics that all persons
activities relate to these. It is a powerful and dominating behaviour
predisposition That provides the pivotal point in a persons entire life.
Very few have this.
 Central traits- These are the core traits that characterize an individuals
Personality. Central traits are the major characteristics of our personalities
That are quite generalized and enduring. They form the building blocks
of our personality.

 Secondary traits- These are traits that are inconsistent or relatively


Superficial, less generalized and far less enduring that affects our behaviour
In specific circumstances.
HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND COPING MECHANISM
 Lesson 1: Emotion-refers to feelings effective responses as a result of
physiological arousal, thoughts and beliefs, subjective evaluation and bodily
expression. It is state characterized by facial expression, gesture, postures,
and subjective feelings.
 James Lange theory by William James and Carl Lange
This state that emotion results from physiological state triggered by stimuli in
the environment: Emotions occurs after physiological reactions. This theory
state that a change situation leads to a changed bodily state. e.g. We feel sad
because we cry, angry because we strike, afraid because we tremble, and
neither have we cried , strike, nor tremble because we are sorry, angry and
fearful as the Case maybe.
 Cannon Bard theory by Philip Bard and Walter Cannon suggest that
people feel emotion first and then act upon them, this a theory that
emotion and physiological reactions occurs simultaneously. E.g. I see a
man outside my window, I'm afraid, I began to perspire. It is base on the
premise that one reacts to a specific stimulus and experiences the
corresponding emotion simultaneously.
 Two factor theory by Schachter & Singer- State that emotions is the
cognitive interpretation of a physiological response. Most people consider
this as “Common Sense”.
 Emotional Intelligence is the area of cognitive ability that facilitates
interpersonal behavior. Dr. Daniel Goleman's book, he described EI as a
persons ability to manage his feelings, so that those feelings are expressed
appropriately and effectively. (EI. Is a capacity to understand and manage
emotions
FIVE COMPONENTS OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE BY GOLEMAN

1. Self Awareness-A person with healthy sense of EI self awareness if they


understand their own strength and weaknesses, as well as their actions affects
others.
2. Self Regulation- A person with high EI Has the ability to exercise restraint and
control when expressing their emotions.
3. Motivation- People with high EI are self motivated, resilient and driven by an
inner ambition rather than being influenced by outside force, such as money or
prestige.
4. Empathy- An empathetic person has compassion and is able to connect with other
people on an emotional level, helping them respond genuinely to others people
concerns.
5. Social Skills- EI people are able to build trust with other people and are able to
quickly gain respect from other people they meet.
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR
1. The group of convicted offenders obtained significantly lower scores on all domains
of MEII ( Mangal Emotional intelligence inventory) such as :
 Intrapersonal awareness (Own emotions)
 Interpersonal awareness (Other emotions)
 Intrapersonal management (Own emotions)
 Interpersonal management (Other emotions)
 And aggregate emotional quotient in comparison to their normal counterparts.
Researcher concluded that, the convicted offenders group had significantly lower EI
compared to normal subjects.
2. EI is deeply related to aggression and offending.
3. Person with high EI levels are more able to moderate their emotions and are less
impulsive while individual with low EI levels are more prone to risky behavior. They
also have a hard time understanding situations from the perspective of others.
4. A reduced capacity to regulate emotions could possibly maintain
offending pattern of behavior of criminals. (e.g. Internet child sexual
abuse is often preceded by unregulated negative feelings)
5. A reduce capacity to regulate anger, desire and sexual arousal may
result in an assault, theft, and sexual assault respectively.
6. Some recent studies, consistently report EI deficits in criminals. In
addition, some studies indicate that offenders are deficient in sub –
components of EI such as social problem-solving, empathy, social
competency, flexibility, impulse control, and self regard.
Instructions

This is a timed exam, you will have 60 mins to complete the exam from the time you start it.
Please make sure to have the exam completed before the cutoff time on the due date listed. You
only get one attempt at the exam.

Please remember that your exams are to be completed on your own and you are not to share your
answers with anyone.

Best of luck to all of you.

Only registered, enrolled users can take graded quizzes

You might also like