![](https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/image-9106896dda.jpg?w=620)
BRITAIN’S Armed Forces chief said today that the world is not on the cusp of World War Three despite tensions with Russia.
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin claimed that the tyrant is fully aware Nato would crush him if he tried to invade due to his "military weakness".
In his speech at the annual Chatham House Security and Defence conference, he explicitly said that Vladimir Putin is "weak".
He said: "Some reflections and observations about Russia. How it has struggled in Ukraine. How we have been surprised at its military weakness. The predicament that it has and how that has worsened by a strengthened Nato."
But any assault by Russia on Nato land would draw out some of the 3.5 million uniformed personnel spread across Europe to come down on Putin’s forces like a ton of bricks.
Admiral Radakin said Nato is becoming a stronger and richer alliance than Russia and China.
"This is an alliance that is becoming stronger all the time," he began.
"Growing from 30 to 32 nations. With a collective GDP 20 times greater than Russia. And a total defence budget three-and-a-half times more than Russia and China combined."
Admiral Radakin also said that Nato’s significant air forces - which outnumber Russia’s three to one, would "quickly establish air superiority".
And the Nato naval reserves would destroy Russian ships as effectively as Ukraine took them on in the Black Sea.
Most read in The Sun
"Nato has four times as many ships and three times as many submarines as Russia," he said, and Britain would sit at the heart of this formidable military response to any aggression in Europe.
He added: "Nato's maritime forces would bottle up the Russian Navy in the Barents and the Baltic, just as Ukraine pushed the Black Sea Fleet from Crimea."
Nato's ground strength is also superior to Putin's, the admiral argued.
"The thousands of Allied troops currently stationed in Poland and the Baltic states could draw on the 3.5 million uniformed personnel across the Alliance for reinforcement," he said.
The UK’s own impressive reserves - contributing 25 per cent of the Nato naval strength and 10 per cent for land and air - bolsters this terrifying prospect for Putin and keeps him from British shores.
He reassured Brits that despite Russia’s brutal two years of war in Ukraine, no military officials in the UK are talking about conscription for everyday civilians.
"We are not on the cusp of war with Russia. We are not about to be invaded," Radakin told security experts at the conference.
"Britain is safe. We are safe because we are part of Nato, the world’s largest and strongest alliance and also because we are a responsible nuclear power," he said.
And despite the recent second failure of the UK’s Trident test launch, Admiral Radakin promised that Britain serves as a fully secure nuclear power.
Admiral Ramakin also lauded the UK’s cyber and space capacity - and our own Special Forces - giving examples of our recent actions abroad in tackling the Houthi threat in Yemen, protecting trade in the Red Sea and leading efforts in Ukraine.
He said: "Time-and-again the British Armed Forces have stepped up to do our bit. And that’s without even considering our domestic roles.
"These are dangerous and uncertain times. But Britain has what it needs to succeed. A G7 economy. An extensive science and technological base. Our island geography.
"Our membership of the world’s strongest alliance. Our status as a nuclear power, and our seat in the UN Security Council.
"Our task is to meld and align these strengths in a way that is faster and bolder than our competitors. That is how we will continue to stay safe. That is how we will win in the future."
Benedetta Berti, head of policy planning for Nato’s secretary general Jens Stoltenberg, said today: "Nato’s nuclear deterrent works," and promised that defence and deterrence is a top priority for the alliance going into 2024.
And David Quarrey, UK ambassador to Nato, agreed that the power of Nato has effectively kept Putin from invading wider Europe.
He said of its nuclear deterrent: "Putin believes in it - that’s why he hasn’t acted in Nato territory for the last two years."
In order to take on Nato, Russia would have to rebuilt its tank fleet as well as its armoured vehicles - and massively replenish both missiles and ammunition.
Putin has lost almost 3,000 tanks since invading Ukraine two years ago.
As Ukraine continues to defy expectations and bravely push back Putin’s forces on the cold frontline - Russia is preoccupied keeping up with the unexpected demands of its current war.
It’s a sign of Russia’s weakness that it's shifting its economy so that it's spending nearly 40 per cent on defence and security
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin
Admiral Radakin said: "I am not saying that Russia is not dangerous. It has demonstrated that with the aggression it employs both domestically and internationally.
"But at the same time it is also significantly less capable than we anticipated following its disastrous illegal invasion into Ukraine."
And, he says, an invasion into Europe would bring Russia face to face with the "straitjacket" of full Nato might - bolstered even further by the joining of Finland and Sweden.
He said: "We’re stronger than any other nation other than America.
"We’re going through an extraordinary transformation…we want to recapitalise the army,” he said, with the injection of over £40billion on new equipment for the British armed forces.
"And we need to be more competitive on electronic warfare."
Britain is part of "the world’s strongest military alliance, which is getting even stronger," he added.
Speaking of conscription and a "citizen army", Admiral Radakin said "those might start to appear as things go on and get more dangerous… there aren’t any plans to do that."
He continued: "There's a continuing realisation that this has been a disastrous war for Russia, 350,000 people killed and wounded.
"It’s a sign of Russia’s weakness that it's shifting its economy so that it's spending nearly 40 per cent on defence and security."
The speech came after the Army's General Sir Patrick Sanders, Chief of the General Staff, warned the military "is too small".
Read More on The US Sun
The British Army has been reduced to its smallest size for centuries - and he said Brits could face a call-up if war does break out.
And ex-Royal Marine Ben McBean said poor pay, conditions and shoddy veteran care give Brits absolutely no incentive to sign up.