Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chocolate Easter Bunny

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of other people's art, whether product packaging or chocolate sculpture. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chocolate Santa Claus.jpg

Themightyquill (talk) 11:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per [1], decision by Yann. --Smial (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep These are too varied to give an easy overall answer and some might yet justify deletion. However most would fall under COM:PACKAGING where the examples here are too trivial (and COM:TOO trivial) to attract protection. Looking at the unwrapped examples they're presumably claiming copyright protection as sculptures, yet here they're too close to being utility objects. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per others above. Yann (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The easter bunny is a general idea and not a copyrighted idea or character. Trying to classify these as sculptures is too flimsy of an argument, because many objects are made as approximations as others for secondary reasons. These objects are food first and not purely decorative. Evan-Amos (talk) 14:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:Schoko-Osterhase IMGP1551 smial wp.jpg File:Schokohase für Ostern, Vollmilchschokolade, February 2010.jpg File:Schokoladen-Osterhase.jpg. derivatives of non free.--Roy17 (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The UnDel mentioned by Smial was simply about a bunny ”shape” wrapped in gold paper with ’’minimal’’ art on packaging. This DR covers actual packaging with drawings and art on it, or chocolate sculptress. While such may be seen as utility objects as Andy Dingley mentioned, I’ve seen no evidence to that effect (also, "continental European copyright laws do not contain such a requirement [that a work must be fixed in a tangible medium of expression], which allows for ephemeral works (like flowery compositions or chocolate sculptures) to be protected by copyright." https://www.clarin.eu/content/clic-overview-copyright-law). Without knowing source country, we must COM:PRP that any medium is copyrightable. I’ve kept some images as being either COM:DM or below COM:TOO. One image was already deleted (File:Lapins de Pâques en chocolat.jpg) so not commenting on that. Also keeping images which was previously kept after other UnDel. To argue for deletion of those files, you should start a DR ona file-by-file basis. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]