Talk:Tim Paterson
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Born
edit'"(1956 or 1957-)"'? You can't get closer than that? nope
Photo
editWhy is there no photo? Here's an article with a photo courtesy of Wikipedia? Go figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Founders Intent (talk • contribs) 01:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Quotes
editAre the quotes really necessary? It seems unencyclopedic to include them as part of the article. Any objections to removing them? -- OlEnglish (Talk) 02:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- In fact, they should be moved to WikiQuote then linked from here. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 08:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
SCCA
editThe guy has been on TV driving SCCA ProRally cars. 99.164.13.146 (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Tim Paterson's blog
editWhy the URL of Paterson's blog (http://dosmandrivel.blogspot.com/) was removed?
The URL is "official link" according to rules:
An official link is a link to a website or other Internet service that meets
- 1. The linked content is controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article.
- 2. The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.77.194.3 (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- I will try and add it back. If it gets reverted, it should be discussed here. I fixed the format in this section as well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 13:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Law suit from 2007
editHe had filed an unsuccessful law suit because of Gary Kildall's role in 2005. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 22:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tim Paterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130514101956/http://www.krsaborio.net/microsoft/research/acrobat/810106.pdf to http://www.krsaborio.net/microsoft/research/acrobat/810106.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031204161621/http://www.ece.umd.edu/courses/enee759m.S2000/papers/paterson1994-kildall.pdf to http://www.ece.umd.edu/courses/enee759m.S2000/papers/paterson1994-kildall.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Why is the date format for this article set to dmy?
editBased on the facts that the subject is American and that the first non-stub edit to include a full date used mdy (going back to December 25, 2009, per MOS:DATERET, I propose that the format be changed to mdy. Unless someone can provide a VALID reason not to make this change, I will do so after a reasonable amount of time has passed. 1980fast (talk) 05:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- That was a non-substantial edit. The article was consistently using the ymd format before that edit.
- I am one of the major contributors to the article, and I was also the first to use a full date in the prose (outside the infobox template). I prefer dmy in the prose and ymd in the references because dmy is much more commonly used and more logical than mdy. ymd is even more logical and easier to parse (as well as shorter) in references which are shared even beyond the English-speaking world. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)