Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India's Most Attractive Brands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

India's Most Attractive Brands

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does in fact seem to be made for pay, and the sources just do not line up here either. I only found this page after looking to add an image book cover in the infobox, but then I looked into it further and discovered that the page itself really qualifies for a deletion AfD. Iljhgtn (talk) 22:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Products. AllyD (talk) 08:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article on a non-notable research company's survey, published between 2013 and 2018. These picked up the expected passing mentions of the named top brands but I am not seeing evidence that the published survey was in itself notable. AllyD (talk) 09:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article appears to simply promote a paid survey by a market research company. Further, no significant third-party media organizations are referencing the study, indicating that it has minimal to no value in and of itself. Volcom95 (talk) 07:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom lacks sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Page is WP:SYNTH and is made for WP:PROMO. Research is not notable and not backed by any secondary independent sources. RangersRus (talk) 12:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.