- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Indrajit Prasad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable scholar. The news articles in which he speaks as an expert are not about himself, they only feature comments by him about medical topics. The papers in the list of "his most cited papers" are not all that well-cited and were all primarily directed by other scholars with some collaboration by him. The creation of this article could be explained by User_talk:M.parvage#Reblocked. Badbluebus (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Science, Medicine, Asia, and Bangladesh. Badbluebus (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. low GS cites in a very high cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC).
- Delete Sourced to primary sources and things written by him. Searches found nothing independent deeper than directory listings. Does not meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn’t pass General Notability Guidelines.–TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 22:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.