Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 18

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion‎ | Log

August 18

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 18, 2024.

WP:SD

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and retarget.

WT:SD should take you to the talk page of WP:SD, so one of them should be retargetted. I have a preference for both of them targeting the respective pages of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion – CSD is the more popular page and WT:SD only has four trackable links – but I can live with either outcome. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 22:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created two of those links 30 minutes ago. What a coincidence. -1ctinus📝🗨 22:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

WP:IRS

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 26#WP:IRS

Pig cop

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was both support and opposition to retargeting to List of police-related slang terms. One suggestion was to refine to the Gameplay section and hatnote from there. Jay 💬 15:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

similarly to doom not actually having invented demons or shotguns, duke nukem 3d didn't invent the concept of comparing american police to raw bacon. they're also a recurring enemy in the series, so it would probably be better off retargeted to the series' article anyway cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wait, found the primary topic, it's in list of police-related slang terms, under p, so i'll vote for retargeting there. shoutouts to the unsourced mention of duki nuki there cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the current and proposed targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

MC flag

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find evidence in reliable sources that this terminology is primarily used to refer to this flag. Hog Farm Talk 16:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Flag of Montgomery

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As likely to refer to the flag of Montgomery, Alabama as this topic; I really don't think this is the primary topic. Hog Farm Talk 16:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Undetharaya

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 28#Undetharaya

Mario party switch

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mario Party#Super Mario Party (2018). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not the only Mario Party game for the Nintendo Switch. Mia Mahey (talk) 20:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dab page. While I don't like it, I think a dab page at the target would be the best solution. There is no one target in Mario Party where a link can go to, as that article is not sorted by console. The nom is right though, that having this link to one specific game is not ideal. Gonnym (talk) 11:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mario Party (Nintendo 3DS)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mario Party#Mario Party: Island Tour (2013). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Party: Island Tour is not the only Mario Party game for the 3DS. Mia Mahey (talk) 20:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dab page. While I don't like it, I think a dab page at the target would be the best solution. There is no one target in Mario Party where a link can go to, as that article is not sorted by console. The nom is right though, that having this link to one specific game is not ideal. Gonnym (talk) 11:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mario Party 3DS

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mario Party#Mario Party: Island Tour (2013). Not enough support for turning into a DAB page. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Party: Island Tour is not the only Mario Party game for the 3DS. Mia Mahey (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dab page. While I don't like it, I think a dab page at the target would be the best solution. There is no one target in Mario Party where a link can go to, as that article is not sorted by console. The nom is right though, that having this link to one specific game is not ideal. Gonnym (talk) 11:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mario Party Wii

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mario Party#Mario Party 8 (2007). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Party 8 is not actually known as "Mario Party Wii." Mario Party 9 was also released for the Wii. Mia Mahey (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dab page. While I don't like it, I think a dab page at the target would be the best solution. There is no one target in Mario Party where a link can go to, as that article is not sorted by console. The nom is right though, that having this link to one specific game is not ideal. Gonnym (talk) 11:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Silly mountain

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 4#Silly mountain

Service with a Smile (film)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Service with a Smile (1937 film) was moved to this title in September 2013, but moved away in December 2013 when Service with a Smile (1934 film) was created (making it ambiguous). WP:PFILM states that this partially-disambiguated title cannot have a primary topic, so it shouldn't redirect to Service with a Smile (1937 film). However, Service with a Smile (disambiguation) does not exist – as Special:PrefixIndex/Service with a Smile shows, this is a WP:TWOOTHER situation, which is adequately handled by the hatnotes on Service with a Smile. Without a good target, I think this redirect should just be deleted, and let the search function handle it. On the other hand, if anyone thinks a disambiguation page would actually be beneficial here, I wouldn't complain about its creation; in that case, the redirect should just be speedily retargeted. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Washington, Maryland

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 19:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This error can plausibly refer to Fort Washington or Washington County, so delete and let the search results take care of it. Queen of Hearts talk 02:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yappy2bhere: Can you clarify what you think "Washington, MD" is referring to? You do say "Keep", which would imply it refers to Fort Washington, Maryland. But you also make a reference that it's a borough, but Fort Washington, Maryland is not one. Loosely defined urban space is not an article, so retargeting there is not an option (although I don't understand why it would be an option?). You also don't define what you think Marlboro, Maryland refers to. There are quite a few options, among them: Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Lower Marlboro, Maryland; Marlboro Village, Maryland; Marlboro Meadows, Maryland and what looks to be the encompassing Greater Upper Marlboro, Maryland. -- Tavix (talk) 13:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 00:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_August_18&oldid=1244043310"