Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 49: Line 49:


'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Edit-warring on the removal of maintenance templates. [[User:Belbury|Belbury]] ([[User talk:Belbury|talk]]) 09:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Edit-warring on the removal of maintenance templates. [[User:Belbury|Belbury]] ([[User talk:Belbury|talk]]) 09:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

=== [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 2735]] ===
* {{pagelinks|United Nations Security Council Resolution 2735}}
'''Reason:''' Should get extended protection, as all similar meaningful resolutions on this contentious topic do (e.g. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2720). Risk of vandalism and biased edits is high. [[User:CrazyPredictor|CrazyPredictor]] ([[User talk:CrazyPredictor|talk]]) 12:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:08, 11 June 2024

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 48JCL TALK 14:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the editors who engaged in the recent edit warring were EC ... upgrading to that level of protection would have no effect on them. If that's what prompted this report, the CTOPS designation allows to impose 1RR instead. Would you prefer that? Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the edit warrimg accounts were Extended-Confirmed, then shouldn't the article be Fully Protected so Extended-Confirmed Users can't edit it? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 20:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We only full-protect pages during severe edit wars, and only for a short period of time (like, IME, never longer than a week). 1RR is better when we get to persistent edit warring involving editors at that level. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs constantly adding possible copyvios and unsourced material. — Iadmctalk  05:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ip edits aren't helpful at all. Another IP pops up again and it definitely needs to be protected. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 05:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Distributive edits from IPs. Likely the same person who has been removing content. Since the Florida version of the ride opens later this month, the page will likely receive a lot of attention in the coming weeks. Contributor19 (talk) 07:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from unregistered editors critical of 2024 winner Bailey Anne Kennedy. Pending changes protection requested. Darrelljon (talk) 08:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Saqib (talk) 08:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring on the removal of maintenance templates. Belbury (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Should get extended protection, as all similar meaningful resolutions on this contentious topic do (e.g. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2720). Risk of vandalism and biased edits is high. CrazyPredictor (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]