Jump to content

Ministerial act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In United States law, a ministerial act is a government action "performed according to legal authority, established procedures or instructions from a superior, without exercising any individual judgment."[1] It can be any act a functionary or bureaucrat performs in a prescribed manner, without exercising any individual judgment or discretion.[2] Under law, this would be classified under the rubric of public policy.

Examples of what is, and is not, ministerial

[edit]

Examples of ministerial acts include:

Actions that are not ministerial would include:

  • a decision about application of a tax law, auditing of an income tax return, determining facts and applying law to those facts, and prioritizing such returns[11]

Effects

[edit]

If a ministerial act is not performed, then a court may issue a writ of mandamus to compel the public official to perform said act.[12]

Absolute or sovereign immunity does not apply to the performance or non-performance of ministerial acts.[13]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Hill, Gerald N. (2002). The people's law dictionary: taking the mystery out of legal language. New York, NY: MJF Books. ISBN 9781567315530. (quotation redacted and ellipses removed)
  2. ^ Id.; Ballentine's Law Dictionary, p. 341.
  3. ^ Ballentine's, supra.
  4. ^ N.Y. Penal L. section 195.00 (requiring a notary to officiate upon request); see also People v. Brooks, 1 Den. 457; which may be found at N.Y. Notary Law Archived 2006-10-11 at the Wayback Machine.
  5. ^ See: California Tax regulations.
  6. ^ See discussion at:Virginia Land Use law, citing Richlands Medical center v. Commonwealth, 230 Va. 384 (1985), Bd. of Co. Supervisors of Prince William Co. v. Hylton Enterprises, Inc., 216 Va. 582(1976).
  7. ^ :Virginia Land Use law, supra, citing Town of Jonesville v. Powell Valley Village LP, 254 Va. 70 (1997).
  8. ^ Virginia Land Use law, supra, citing Planning Comm'n of City of Falls Church v. Berman, 211 Va. 774 (1971).
  9. ^ Ministerial Act news
  10. ^ Second Circuit Blog, citing Burell V. United States, No. 05-2945-cr (2nd Cir. 2006)(decision by Sotomayor, J.), at [1].
  11. ^ See, supra, California Tax regulations
  12. ^ Virginia Land Use law, supra, citing Phillips v. Telum, Inc., 223 Va. 585 (1982).
  13. ^ Virginia Land Use law, supra, citing Bogan v. Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44 (1998); Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987); Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982); and Heider v. Clemons,241 Va. 143 (1991).

See also

[edit]