User contributions for 85.193.228.103
Appearance
For 85.193.228.103 talk block log logs global block log filter log
29 March 2021
- 00:2600:26, 29 March 2021 diff hist +2 Talk:Line splice →A splice or splicing?
- 00:0200:02, 29 March 2021 diff hist +449 Talk:Line splice →A splice or splicing?: new section
12 March 2021
- 00:0100:01, 12 March 2021 diff hist −8 Word order readability "This notwithstanding"? Oh, please, never again.
5 March 2021
- 13:5013:50, 5 March 2021 diff hist +20 History of computing hardware (1960s–present) Ok, so how about this: "Around 1953 - 1959, discrete transistors started being considered sufficiently reliable (...)"? Now the reader see the process that took several years to complete, at least according to what you have written in the article discussion.
- 13:3313:33, 5 March 2021 diff hist +13 Trolleybus Perfect. Good for you. Your logic is even better :-) But how about this? "Trolleybus systems employ overhead wires above the roads, often shared with other vehicles." BTW: "on which they travel" is clearly redundant. But we can leave it, of course.
4 March 2021
- 15:3115:31, 4 March 2021 diff hist +3 Trolleybus →Comparison to motorbuses: logic: Trolleybus systems employ overhead wires above the roads used also by other vehicles.
1 March 2021
- 18:5618:56, 1 March 2021 diff hist +871 Talk:History of computing hardware (1960s–present) →Misleading sentence: "By 1959 (...)": fantastic explanation
- 15:3615:36, 1 March 2021 diff hist +1,015 Talk:History of computing hardware (1960s–present) →Misleading sentence: "By 1959 (...)": new section
- 14:1614:16, 1 March 2021 diff hist +169 Talk:Franz Kafka →Ambiguous sentence: You are right, now I see it clearly. Thanks :-)
28 February 2021
- 23:1223:12, 28 February 2021 diff hist +368 Talk:Franz Kafka →Ambiguous sentence: new section
- 22:5422:54, 28 February 2021 diff hist +9 History of computing hardware (1960s–present) "by 1959" means "not later than 1959", and I don't think it was the intended meaning; See: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/by_1 Tag: Reverted
- 22:1722:17, 28 February 2021 diff hist −19 Atari Corporation 1. readability: "all but" instead of "almost"? Oh, please, never again. "all but" is one of the most illogical idioms ever, and confusing for non-English speakers; 2. "as a result" was redundant - "consequently" means "as a result"
- 21:5021:50, 28 February 2021 diff hist −1 Atari Falcon sounds more natural
- 20:3620:36, 28 February 2021 diff hist 0 Transistor computer If you can ONLY speak English, then you can't write or read in English. If you can speak ONLY English, then English is the only language you know. Tag: Reverted
- 20:1420:14, 28 February 2021 diff hist 0 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2: typo
- 17:2717:27, 28 February 2021 diff hist +946 Confectionery Wrong definition. Confectionery is not the art of making confectionery, like sweets are not the art of making sweets, like pizza is not the art of making pizza. Of course, there is also something like the art of making confectionery, but our article is about food. Tag: Reverted
27 February 2021
- 00:0500:05, 27 February 2021 diff hist −4 Peter Pan He was more naughty than mischievous Tag: Reverted
26 February 2021
- 23:0923:09, 26 February 2021 diff hist 0 BBC Books majority-owned
- 23:0823:08, 26 February 2021 diff hist 0 Fox Sports majority-owned
- 23:0623:06, 26 February 2021 diff hist 0 National oil company majority-owned
- 23:0023:00, 26 February 2021 diff hist 0 MAN SE restored; Look here: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/majority-owned Tag: Undo
- 22:0722:07, 26 February 2021 diff hist −52 Guthrie Govan Less poetry, more readability. And now you can "move on to later eras" ;)
- 18:0118:01, 26 February 2021 diff hist +10 WxFormBuilder Light, heat, sound can be emitted, but code? Code can be written, created or generated.
- 17:2417:24, 26 February 2021 diff hist 0 MAN SE "majority-owned" looks better than "majority owned" Tag: Reverted
- 02:5902:59, 26 February 2021 diff hist 0 Devil's advocate Restored. Of course it is an idiom. But why not use a more common plain English phrase instead of an illogical idiom. Does "common parlance" sound more clever or trendy? Do we want to sound more intelligent? Are we more intelligent than our readers? But Wikipedia is also for kids and less educated people. Does not readability matters? And, please, do not send me to Simple Wiki - it is not a serious alternative. Tag: Undo
- 01:4001:40, 26 February 2021 diff hist +8 Electric bus Not only "majorly" is informal but also misleading in the current context
- 01:2301:23, 26 February 2021 diff hist 0 Flywheel energy storage If you can ONLY speak English, then you can't write or read in English. If you can speak ONLY English, then English is the only language you know.
25 February 2021
- 23:5623:56, 25 February 2021 diff hist 0 Devil's advocate readability: "common parlance", though widely used, is a very illogical phrase, and sounds like "common jargon", but the article is not about jargon Tag: Reverted
- 02:0002:00, 25 February 2021 diff hist −2 Self-defeating personality disorder I have just rendered the article more readable, Yes, it rendered me think ;-) Tag: Reverted
21 February 2021
- 22:5822:58, 21 February 2021 diff hist +137 User talk:CateFromArcadia Here is the correct version of my rhetorical question: "Leave me alone"?
20 February 2021
- 00:5200:52, 20 February 2021 diff hist +462 User talk:Trovatore →Murder: new section
19 February 2021
- 20:5220:52, 19 February 2021 diff hist +147 Talk:Murder →in the absence of malice?
- 20:4720:47, 19 February 2021 diff hist +17 Murder Why not link to ''malice'' ? A footnote is good when we do not have an article to link to.
- 20:2620:26, 19 February 2021 diff hist −11 Zong massacre every murder is deliberate - by definition; You cannot murder someone by accident.
- 20:2520:25, 19 February 2021 diff hist +12 Murder a relevant word added
- 20:0520:05, 19 February 2021 diff hist +900 Talk:Murder →in the absence of malice?: new section
- 16:5916:59, 19 February 2021 diff hist −949 User talk:CateFromArcadia "→Golden hour (medicine): "Live me alone"? Tag: Manual revert
- 16:2916:29, 19 February 2021 diff hist +4 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2: typo
- 16:1416:14, 19 February 2021 diff hist +160 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2
- 15:5715:57, 19 February 2021 diff hist +137 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2: disclaimer
18 February 2021
- 22:3322:33, 18 February 2021 diff hist +423 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2
- 20:4820:48, 18 February 2021 diff hist +1,006 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2
- 13:2313:23, 18 February 2021 diff hist +283 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2
- 13:1313:13, 18 February 2021 diff hist +50 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2
17 February 2021
- 04:0304:03, 17 February 2021 diff hist +40 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2
- 03:4703:47, 17 February 2021 diff hist +364 Talk:Amantadine →Time to add a Section on use in Sars-CoV-2
16 February 2021
- 17:4317:43, 16 February 2021 diff hist −11 Phil Rudd readability: "he was inducted into the group" = "he was admitted to the group" = he entered the group; It is obvious that someone else wanted him in the group.
- 17:2117:21, 16 February 2021 diff hist −2 Phil Rudd readability
- 16:2716:27, 16 February 2021 diff hist −2 Fruit (plant structure) also before consumption :-)