Jump to content

Talk:Birds-1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBirds-1 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBirds-1 is the main article in the Birds-1 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 8, 2018Good article nomineeListed
July 7, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Birds-1/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 00:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 00:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mention Japan's involvement in the lead.
  • "Nigeria has a background with satellites," Nigerian engineers and scientists?
    • More the government, since they contracted it out. Changed to that. Kees08 (Talk)
  • "Sometimes MongolSat-1 is referred to as Mongolia's first satellite, but it was launched by Bermuda-based company ABS and built by U.S. company Boeing. It was co-branded as MongolSat-1 after launch. Birds-1 successfully launched the first satellite for Bangladesh, Ghana, Mongolia, and Nigeria." [citation needed]
  • "as part of the Joint Global Multi-Nation Birds Satellite project, which is a cross-border interdisciplinary satellite project for non-spacefaring countries supported by Japan" No need to mention the project twice.
  • "The satellites communicate with seven ground stations: one in each of the countries participating in the Birds-1 program, and one each in Thailand and Taiwan. The satellites all use the same radio frequency." Make sure no consecutive sentences start with the same words.
  • Link the countries in the Future work section.
  • Dates are not consistent in the references.
  • Jack Fischer's tweet ref should include his name, link to his article, and tweet inside the title of the text. Look at the {{Cite tweet}}'s example section.

That should be it. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]