Talk:Hot to Go!/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 00:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Elephantranges (talk · contribs) 22:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll take a crack at reviewing this one; this is my first time doing a GA review so please bear with me, thanks! Elephantranges (talk) 22:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Elephantranges: Hey! Thank you for taking this one on. Greatly appreciated. And don't worry- feel free to take as much time as you need. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 22:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So far in terms of the basics (no edit warring, no bias, grammar is fine, etc.) it looks good, I'll take a closer look tomorrow to examine the references and such.

One addition I would suggest would be a dedicated section covering the commercial performance of the song. This would be especially useful in the case of this song, as you could more thoroughly explain its status as a sleeper hit and its progress regarding chart positions, streaming numbers, etc. Elephantranges (talk) 00:43, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Elephantranges:

Done. Let me know if you need anything else added. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 23:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! I've cleared it for number 3 as I think you've got all the major aspects covered, and it doesn't seem like it goes off-topic at any points. Elephantranges (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Elephantranges: Hey! You think you could wrap up the review today? Would be great if you can. Thank you! Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 16:35, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I've been busy and forgot. But yes I can finish right now! Elephantranges (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck complete, no OR, everything looks good! Passing Elephantranges (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Elephantranges: Thank you! I think you might've not fully closed the review, however. Haven't received a notification about it yet. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 21:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it should be good now, I'll check back in a little bit to make sure, though. Thanks for your patience! Elephantranges (talk) 23:33, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·