Jump to content

Talk:Khitrovo Gospels

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

See Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_11 and scroll down to the boxed-up entry for the European Library. The Khitrovo Gospel is not the nucleus of an article on a notable topic that can be expanded in a meaningful way by regular editors. It is possible that a side-mention of the Khitrovo Gospel might belong in one of our existing articles on Russian history. An entire article need not exist just to provide a repository for a single link to the European Library. EdJohnston 05:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The UNESCO Memory of the World Register states that "The manuscript has a great significance in the human written history of universal philosophy and culture.". I added the link and I will remove the deletion tag. Stammer 12:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the prod as inappropriate. I commented vigourously at the time against the EL setting-up these un-wiki stubs, & reworked it a bit myself I think. It is now no worse than many Illuminated MS stubs, & the book is unquestionably notable. To say: "The Khitrovo Gospel is not the nucleus of an article on a notable topic that can be expanded in a meaningful way by regular editors" is just plain wrong. It should have an IM stub tag, btw. Johnbod 13:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gospels

[edit]

A very welcome expansion & pic, but what are the contents? Is it just one Gospel, or should it be renamed to Khitrovo Gospels? Johnbod 15:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

read more carefully & moved. I renamed the redlink one on the assumption it has the set too. Johnbod 15:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khitrovo Gospels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]