Talk:Kitty Lee Jenner
![]() | Kitty Lee Jenner has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 22, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Kitty Lee Jenner appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- ... that author Katharine Lee (pictured) was also known as Morvoren, having become a bard at Gorsedd Cymru in 1904? Source: "She was made a bard of the Welsh gorsedd in 1904; her bardic name was Morvoren." ODNB - doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/75066
- ALT1:... that after reading a book by Katharine Lee (pictured), D. H. Lawrence began to use the phoenix as his personal emblem? Source: Nigg, Joe (2016). The Phoenix: An Unnatural Biography of a Mythical Beast. University of Chicago Press. p. 360 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=PmQpDQAAQBAJ&dq
- ALT2:... that referring to Katharine Lee's Christian Symbolism, D. H. Lawrence wrote "It is necessary to grasp the Whole. At last I have got it."? Source: Eggert, Paul (1997). "Discourse versus Authorship". In Cohen, Philip G. (ed.). Texts and Textuality: Textual Instability, Theory, and Interpretation. Psychology Press. p. 225. https://books.google.com/books?id=sMansmNAwiYC&dq
Moved to mainspace by Mujinga (talk). Self-nominated at 18:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC).
This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and any of the hooks could be used, however I prefer ALT0 and ALT1, and think ALT2 is a bit opaque. The image is in the public domain, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 16:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kitty Lee Jenner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 10:46, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! I will be reviewing this article using the table below. Comments will follow shortly. Looking forward to getting stuck in :) Unexpectedlydian♯4 talk‽ 10:46, September 17, 2022 (UTC)
- Hi again, I'm finished the initial review so will put the article on hold for now. It's always great to read interesting articles which come under Women in Red. If you have any questions about my review please do ping me! Unexpectedlydian♯4 talk‽ 16:14, September 17, 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking this on! Mujinga (talk) 09:19, September 18, 2022 (UTC)
- I have answered everything I think, please see what you think Mujinga (talk) 17:35, September 18, 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your responses! I've crossed off everything which is completed, a few suggestions remaining. Let me know if you have any questions or suggestions Unexpectedlydian♯4 talk‽ 11:54, September 19, 2022 (UTC)
- It's nice to have such a collegiate review! I've made responses below and have requested a copy of the Jenner ODNB article at the resource exchange which will hopefully allow me to wrap up the outstanding issues. Please let me know if there's anything else. Mujinga (talk) 20:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your responses! I've crossed off everything which is completed, a few suggestions remaining. Let me know if you have any questions or suggestions Unexpectedlydian♯4 talk‽ 11:54, September 19, 2022 (UTC)
- I have answered everything I think, please see what you think Mujinga (talk) 17:35, September 18, 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking this on! Mujinga (talk) 09:19, September 18, 2022 (UTC)
- Someone very kindly sent over the article, I can send it over if you'd like but right now your email function is turned off Mujinga (talk) 10:27, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- I've used the ODNB to cover what was left over, I hope Mujinga (talk) 10:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Mujinga, sorry for not replying for a few days. Thank you for finding the article! Unfortunately it looks like the Wikipedia Library Oxford sources are still out of action, hoping we hear an update soon. I will do a final sweep of the article and your changes. Thanks for your patience :) Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 20:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- I've used the ODNB to cover what was left over, I hope Mujinga (talk) 10:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Early life
Career
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead sections
Layout Infobox
Gallery
Death
Words to watch
Fiction
List incorporation
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Source spot check
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
|
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
|
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
|
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
@Mujinga Just had a final read through and it all looks good. Thank you for persisting with the sources. Very happy to pass the article! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 20:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
|
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- GA-Class Cornwall-related articles
- Low-importance Cornwall-related articles
- All WikiProject Cornwall pages
- GA-Class Women artists articles
- WikiProject Women artists articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 150 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- GA-Class Women in Religion articles
- Low-importance Women in Religion articles