Jump to content

Talk:My Boo (Usher and Alicia Keys song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMy Boo (Usher and Alicia Keys song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starMy Boo (Usher and Alicia Keys song) is part of the Confessions series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 15, 2008Good article nomineeListed
October 30, 2008Good topic candidatePromoted
May 21, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Sample

[edit]

Anybody have any idea as to what the sample in this song is, Its definitely well hidden, but I'm sure as it was such a big song there must of been some coverage of it because of legal reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.37.34 (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

[edit]

This song was originally an unreleased duet between Usher and a demo singer that was supposed to appear on the original Confessions album. The demo singer was rumored to be Beyoncé Knowles, but fans quickly proved that the vocals were drastically different, but it could possibly be Beyonce's sister, Solange Knowles. There was even a 'casting demo' of Usher singing with both Alicia & the unknown singer on trial to see who should be Usher's duet partner, and both candidates brought different lyrics. When they decided to release the song, the version with Alicia's vocal's was chosen. The version with Usher and the demo singer was leaked to a Tapemasters Inc. Mixtape in summer of 2004.

At one point in mid-October 2004, "My Boo" was the twelfth most-searched-for music term on the Yahoo! search engine's Buzz Index. --Efe (talk) 08:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination on hold

[edit]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of March 12, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: checkY Pass. Generally well written.
2. Factually accurate?: checkY Pass. Well referenced.
3. Broad in coverage?: ☒N The reception section does not give a wide-ranging analysis from multiple music critics. It has one view from one website. This needs to be expanded with more quotes from reviews on other notable websites (including references) to prove it received mixed reviews.
Ok; reviews for this song are limited. I'll try. --Efe (talk) 00:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added one review from Rolling Stone. --Efe (talk) 01:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
4. Neutral point of view?: checkY Pass. Fair representation without bias.
5. Article stability? checkY Pass. No edit wars etc.
6. Images?: checkY Pass. Both images have complete fair use rationales and appropriate captions.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved, and leave a message on my talk page. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 19:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the article seems good to pass, although I think more evaluations from critics would help it significantly, but I do understand that there are few reviews avaliable at this time. Well done for all your work on the article. Thanks. - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 13:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

Is there a copyright free public domain image for use on the R&B and Soul Music Portal ? Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 23:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, no. If there's any, I'll be happy to add them in the page. Currently, I'm looking for images. --Efe (talk) 00:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on My Boo (Usher and Alicia Keys song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on My Boo (Usher and Alicia Keys song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]