Jump to content

Talk:Robert L. McLeod

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by PCN02WPS (talk). Self-nominated at 23:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Robert L. McLeod; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Thank you PCN02WPS for two well-written articles. Both articles were recently expanded 5x, well-written and within policy. No image so no problem there. No qpq's have been done, so that needs to be addressed. Furthermore, I find the hook in its present form a bit lacking. I imagine that an arrangement of having two co-presidents of colleges are not extremely rare; at least it does not strike the reader immediately as something particularly intriguing. However, the reason they were co-presidents is that one of them was serving onboard an aircraft carrier in the Pacific Ocean during World War II. That is actually quite unexpected an interesting. Could perhaps the hook be elaborated a bit, to tease the reader into reading the articles, using this fact? I think there are options here. Let me know what you think. Kind regards, Yakikaki (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We are in WP:QPQ backlog mode. Double reviews are required.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert L. McLeod/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 23:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: HistoryTheorist (talk · contribs) 18:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to review this article for the GAN review drive and hope to add comments shortly. As I am not a super experienced reviewer, I will ask for a second opinion, as is the rules for the backlog drive. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 18:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
  • In both the lede section and the career section you mention that After the war's end McLeod resigned. While you, I, and probably a lot of educated Western readers know what war you are mentioning, I think it might be helpful to mention the specific war at least once in the article.
  • Following his time in Louisville he studied at the University of Edinburgh from 1923 to 1924 and, after his return to the United States, he spent time at Princeton Theological Seminary and Union Theological Seminary. Longer sentence would read better if broken up.
  • Winter Haven, Florida is linked three times in the article. Perhaps linking it in the personal life section is unnecessary?
  • In that job, he worked closely with Charles J. Turck, who had left office as president of Centre College in 1936 and was working for the PCUSA's Board of Christian Education in Philadelphia at the time I know that you worked on the Turck article, but nothing in your citations points to him leaving in 1936. Perhaps find a citation in the Turck article and move it here?
  • If it is possible, perhaps give page numbers on the interview citations? While I was checking one of the sentences, I nearly got lost and thought there was OR when there really wasn't and page numbers would have been beneficial.
  • Clarifying question: when McLeod recounts his experience, he calls his ship the USS Antetha. How were you able to ascertain that he actually meant the USS Antietam?
  • While you wrote that McLeod retired for good in 1981, I don't the interview giving a specific year for his "real" retirement. Perhaps you could point me to where you got that date?
    Makes sense; all good now :) ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 16:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PCN02WPS: Unless I find some other minor grammar/wording error, I think the article is good to go once you dress my final comments and is most likely going to pass. Because of the backlog drive rules, I'll find somebody else to double-check my work. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 00:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For anybody who is performing an assist -- I spot checked all citations except those I didn't have access to, mainly the books cited and the ancestry citation (reliable because it is an official gov record). ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 00:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryTheorist: Happy to help. simongraham (talk) 06:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HistoryTheorist and Simongraham: everything taken care of or responded to! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 12:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.