Jump to content

User talk:Brobginian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DCAU page

[edit]

Hi, I would rather not have an argument and I apologise if this comes off as rude but you've removed Batman and Harley Quinn from the feature-length movies however it is in fact canon and Bruce Timm himself has stated as such. Another user had even added external evidence to this before an anonymous user removed this evidence and then you removed the actual addition yourself BatQuinn (talk) 23:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you recently removed content from Die Hard with a Vengeance without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DonIago (talk) 18:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to X-Men Origins: Wolverine, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Suicide Squad (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at X-Men: Apocalypse, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add your own Rotten Tomatoes-style consensus. This is synthesis and is forbidden by policy. We already have a reliable source that tells us what critics thought – Rotten Tomatoes. You can quote this or paraphrase what it says if you want to discuss what critics thought. See MOS:FILM for more on this: The overall critical reception to a film should be supported by attributions to reliable sources that summarize reviews; do not synthesize individual reviews. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]