User talk:FozzTexx

Welcome!

Hello, FozzTexx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! talk to !dave 13:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apple II Plus

Hi there! Thanks for your edit, but just a few things:

We unfortunately can't use your own personal experience to prove that something is true. We instead need reliable, published, secondary sources to state information -- in some sense, Wikipedia regurgitates, in a unified and encyclopedic form, what these sorts of sources say.
The fact that it is a dead link is not a problem. I'll run a bot over the page to see if it can find an archived version, and if not, then I'll find one myself.

Thanks, talk to !dave 13:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you're calling a "reliable published secondary source" in claiming that the Apple II Plus ceased to be manufactured at the end of the 1982 is obviously *not* reliable since I own a computer that was made after they were supposedly discontinued. I don't see any references on the archived page indicating how that guy came up with his December 1982 date either. You can see the pictures here: https://twitter.com/FozzTexx/status/1007820286006198272 FozzTexx (talk) 13:23, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I mean, we wouldn't use somebody's Twitter usually as a source. You suggest it was manufactured in 1983 owing to the date codes. In those photos there is nothing stating '1983' directly, you know, like at the bottom of my Lenovo laptop it says "Mfg Date: 13/09/27" (27 Sep '13) unless I'm missing something. Using that as source would violate WP:SYNTH, specifically Similarly, do not combine different parts of one source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. since it is a mere suggestion that it was built in 83, rather than any direct evidence of such (unless, again, I'm not seeing anything). Interesting find, what we need is to see what other sources say about when production stopped. If it's not super clear then both dates can be added. Thanks for your reply as well. talk to !dave 15:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The date codes are on the ICs and on the mainboard. On the mainboard you can see it has date code 4383 meaning it was manufactured the 43rd week of 1983 meaning it was manufactured between Oct 24 and Oct 30. Date codes on ICs are YYWW. The 6502 itself has a date code of 8331 which is Aug 1-7. The two ROM chips in the photos are 8322 and 8326. I think the December 1982 is just made up based on the IIe being introduced in early 1983. Apple clearly didn't stop making them in 1982. FozzTexx (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] says Dec 1982 as well. I get what you are saying, and your process of how you got to that date, but its whether a reliable source said it, and by that, its whether that source has any sense of editorial oversight as to what it is writing. This is unfortunately Wikipedia, not the real world, and as a result, it sometimes has to be WP:NOTRIGHT. You seem to be right, but this is, in our strange parallel wikiuniverse, not good enough -- we need a source that says that models were manufactured after '82, and says this straight. We can't use this user talk page as a source to explain how one arrived at such date, and since places, editorial oversight or not, are saying Dec '82, exceptional claims require exceptional sources, and this a good case of this. talk to !dave 17:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FozzTexx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your picture Speak-Spell.jpg has been moved to Wikimedia Commons

Hi there,

Thanks for your picture "Speak-Spell.jpg"! In order to make this more widely usable across all Wikimedia projects (including English Wikipedia), I've transferred it to Wikimedia Commons. You can find the new upload here.

If there's anything you don't like about the description or other aspects of the transfer, feel free to alter them.

Once again, thanks for your contribution!

Ubcule (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]