Jump to content

User talk:Richwales/Archives/2011-05

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


GOCE drive newsletter

The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive


The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive.

Awards and barnstars
A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GOCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page.

We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest

You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Anchor baby

Hey Rich, please weigh in on my most recent additions/removals from the article.Cúchullain t/c 17:35, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Law of Nations

It is an indisputable fact that "Law of Nations" is referenced in the US Constitution. Since it is also an indisputable fact that the founders and Continental Congress used the Law of Nations as a reference, what is your evidence that the Law of Nations referenced in the Constitution, is not in fact the Law of Nations used by the writers of the Constitution? Sempi (talk) 06:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Conrad Hilton, Jr.
Khinkali
Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.
Moreton (Dorset) railway station
Coast Cable 11
Provincial Secretary of Prince Edward Island v. Egan
Constant Vanden Stock
Scarborough and Whitby Railway
Refugee travel document
Anterior ligament of head of fibula
Y-cable
.45 (film)
Long Hot Summer (1983 song)
Spender
SS Glitra
FALCON (cable system)
Yeovil Town railway station
Severn Bridge Junction
United States Virgin Islands Supreme Court
Cleanup
Reliability of Wikipedia
Law of chastity
Turkish Cypriot folk dances
Merge
United States federal courts
Sealing (Mormonism)
Constitution Project
Add Sources
United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind
Netherlands
Taksim (politics)
Wikify
U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual
Committee of 100 (United States)
British Approvals Service for Cables
Expand
Thessaloniki
Index of Cyprus-related articles
The Walt Disney Company

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Correct

My post clearly states the case. It is so painfully obvious this contributor is blocked User:Griot. He will be reported to the Wikimedia Support Team. 99.25.219.55 (talk) 05:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Anythingyouwant

I'm not sure if you saw this. Weazie just deleted it.

Did any of you notice what happened with Anythingyouwant above due to Weazie's deletions Anythingyouwant, had this to say, "I'm not going to bother arguing with you, or trying to satisfy you, because instead of modifying or rephrasing you prefer to completely delete material that is obviously relevant. Banging my head against the wall would be more useful.  :-) Cheers" Anythingyouwant, appears to have given up and been chased away due to Weazie's repeated deletions. The outright deletions of multiple contributors, without any consensus from them at all, was simply wrong. Sempi (talk) 06:03, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

How does Weazie get to delete everything, and then decide the discussion is closed? Are Johnuniq and Weazie one and the same? Sempi (talk) 06:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Astra 1M
My Daddy, the Crocodile Hunter
Musculi pectinati
Rencong script
Northern Ireland Sign Language
Sabah Wildlife Department
Flash Gordon (physician)
Turner v. Safley
Onesilus
Fordham railway station
ECFS (cable system)
LaTanya Richardson
Aurora Cable Internet
Arrin Hawkins
Mario Sorrenti
Fawley Branch Line
Mary-Ellis Bunim
Lower extremity of tibia
Robert Fellmeth
Cleanup
Voiceless retroflex fricative
Ottoman Empire
Caucasus
Merge
Brazilian frigate Bosísio (F48)
Postal codes in Andorra
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.
Add Sources
Gaza flotilla raid
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu
2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull
Wikify
Postal codes in Armenia
William Pitt (Canada)
Califano v. Aznavorian
Expand
Education in Moldova
Lebanon
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Canada (Labour Relations Board)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Task Force news: Recent updates include basic minor changes and condensing at the main page, a new project sub page and talk for Radical Alternatives , additional comments on the main page talk page, and messages at Task force talk. A current priority is to reach suggested criteria/tasks for clerks, and then to establish a local consensus vis-à-vis clerking. Please remember to keep all the project and its talk pages on your watchlist. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for updating uw-sanctions for Ayn Rand. Can I suggest that the link to the remedies should be Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ayn Rand#Additional sanctions, since it is remedy #13 (Additional sanctions) which is the equivalent of Discretionary sanctions. Remedy #13 is way down at the end and could easily be missed by the person you are leaving the notice for. Not a big deal either way. It seems that nobody has ever been 'notified' by an admin under that decision. If your uw-sanctions is ever used to give warnings under Ayn Rand it will be a new frontier. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Good point. Unfortunately, the "#Final decision" part of the link is hard-wired into the template itself. While I suppose the link in the "Decision linked to" column in the documentation part of the template's page could be changed to point to the "#Additional sanctions" section of the Ayn Rand case, that wouldn't have any effect on the link that someone receiving the warning would see. I believe, too, that a valid argument could (and would) be made that people need to be directed to the full decision in order for them to understand exactly why ArbCom had to get involved (and thus to provide context for the discretionary sanctions). Richwales (talk · contribs) 20:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC)