User talk:S-Aura

Welcome[edit]

Hello, AFTHAB RAHMAN SUNNU, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Sahla parappan moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sahla parappan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sahla Parappan[edit]

Hello, AFTHAB RAHMAN SUNNU. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sahla Parappan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! AFTHAB RAHMAN SUNNU, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sahla Parappan[edit]

Hello, AFTHAB RAHMAN SUNNU. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sahla Parappan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Contributing![edit]

Hello! After few months, I am excited to return to contributing to Wikipedia. I look forward to collaborating with fellow editors and continuing to improve and expand the content on this valuable resource. If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to reach out to me on my talk page. Happy editing! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 02:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MOBICON, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverview Hotel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! for guidance 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Ae245. I noticed that in this edit to Yahoo! Mobile, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ae245 (talk) 09:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Actually there is a draft page name Yahoo! Mobile. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 09:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if you'd like to move the draft to this title, you should tag the page with {{db-move|1=page to be moved|2=reason}} There's no need to blank the page. Ae245 (talk) 09:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the draft page is notable than please try to move in main space. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 09:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ganga Kinare[edit]

Hello S-Aura, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ganga Kinare, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganga Kinare.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 12:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello! @TheLongTone I think Ganga Kinare is Notable Topic and enough source available on Google Search Engine and also a 4 star hotel in Rishikesh established in 1989. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 13:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dear @TheLongTone i have few questions 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 14:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which are? Ask away! I do think you need to know what is necessary to establish notability (as Wikipedia defines it). In the case of a business, it requires significant and independant sources, so with a hotel a lot of press coverage or other mentions (such as in guide books) will simply be the kind of run-of-the-mill stuff that any hotel will generate.TheLongTone (talk) 12:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, @TheLongTone I got my answer and my second one is can I am eligible for Other access eg, Rollback on Wikipedia ? thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atrococcus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goux.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Werner Stiehler (July 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Werner Stiehler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! @DoubleGrazing, please recheck the draft Werner_Stiehler it was translated from German Wikipedia. Although it was thoroughly reviewed and approved on the German site. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what is it you want me to re-check? Are you saying I missed something? Or just saying you're not happy with the decline? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for ip block exemption[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S-Aura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am reaching out to request an IP block exemption. I am a user from Areekode, Kerala, and I am currently traveling. Unfortunately, my IP address 2402:3a80::/32 has been blocked for the past 8-10 days, Blocking my ability to access and contribute to Wikipedia. I kindly request that you consider granting me an IP block exemption, as I am a legitimate user who wishes to continue using Wikipedia without interruption. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, S-Aura 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declined. That IP address range block does not affect you, provided you are signed in. And you've demonstrated numerous edits over the past several days, showing you have no problems editing at this time. Yamla (talk) 09:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The IP range you mentioned, 2402:3a80::/32 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)), is only anon-blocked, which means that you can still edit from the range while you are logged in to your account. I don't see any other issues or affected addresses, so please add any further information if you have it. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 09:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article under extended-protected[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit extended-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Not done Please make your specific request on the article's talk page. --Yamla (talk) 21:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! @Yamla Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 21:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luca Verhoeven for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luca Verhoeven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Verhoeven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DanCherek (talk) 16:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]