Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Élie de Rothschild
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 21:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Élie de Rothschild (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Repairing a malformed nomination; User:Nineteen Nightmares, the original nominator, had recopied the entire article into this page with a prod template at the top. His reasoning was that subject has done nothing of note, with the exception of having been born into an extremely wealthy banking family, having of course "run" one of the family's many businesses. The rest of the article talks about his time in the army and private family life, with little to no public value. This is strictly a procedural nomination to repair a user error; no vote from me. Bearcat (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I won't be nominating anything more for a while. My first time, had to go wrong I suppose. Anyway, thanks for the assist. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Ninteeen Nightmares[reply]
- Keep. Apparently notable enough to merit lengthy obits in The Telegraph, The Independent, and The Los Angeles Times. The London Times obituary claims he revived Chateau Lafite after the Second World War. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - four obits from four major newspapers. Bearian (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: person notable, here the artikle in French Wiki. Dewritech (talk) 19:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.