Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arena Solutions

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2015 November 24.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 15:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arena Solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I removed a couple of paragraphs reproduced from the vendor's own site, etc. AllyD (talk) 06:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A Highbeam search returns a lot of routine announcements, from the firm's name change through to a new partnership with GoodData but I am not seeing anything substantial about the firm. There is a brief paragraph in a book and namechecks in a few others, but I am not seeing anything that meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Happy to revise opinion if anyone locates something better, particularly if it supports the "pioneered" claim in the first paragraph of the article. AllyD (talk) 07:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article does make a notability claim: pioneered cloud product lifecycle management (PLM) applications. Howver, there is not enough independent coverage to back-up that claim. The brief mention in the book The Incredible Payback: Innovative Sourcing Solutions That Deliver Extraordinary Results does say ground breaking. But this is not substantiated elsewhere. This aside, it fails WP:CORPDEPTH. --Bejnar (talk) 20:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I simply found nothing better to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.