Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinal Newman High School (Columbia, South Carolina)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow keep (non-admin closure). John from Idegon (talk) 09:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal Newman High School (Columbia, South Carolina)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This school does not appear to meet our notability standards. That, and it seems to have some serious CoI and Original Research going on, given the way it's written being similar to an advertisement and citing the school's website as a reliable source. --Rainythunderstorm (talk) 10:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:58, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:58, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:58, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep We have generally held high schools to be notable, and I have found enough sources to write an article on this one. Mangoe (talk) 14:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. I'll find time to fix refs/language. EagleFan (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a secondary school. I removed excessive negative tagging at the top of the article. I left the citation-needed tags within the article, though I don't see the need to question every darn thing about it. If the school website says it is a middle school and a high school, for example, I don't think a better source is needed. --do ncr am 16:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this high school has been in existence for a long time, and high school articles fulfill a core Wikipedia objective of getting newbies to get some experience editing--they are gateway articles. Abductive (reasoning) 16:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.