Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chirp (formerly Cilter Technologies)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chirp (formerly Cilter Technologies) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very new/small start-up business that fails WP:NORG and WP:SIGCOV. The coverage of this small company (of perhaps 12 employees?) is the type of "startup receives seed funding" business reporting that is common for any similar business. What limited coverage does exist relates to the company's previous brand name - to the extent that the only source (connecting the title of the article with the entity discussed in the article) is the org's own LinkedIn page. If we do not have sufficient reliable/independent sources to even establish that a company of this name exists (and is the same company covered in the other few sources), then SIGCOV is not met. Clearly WP:TOOSOON. (Would have PRODed, but the creator of the article moved it to the main article namespace [over DRAFT]. And re-added [at best] quasi-promotional text about the org being "award-winning". Therefore not "uncontroversial".) Guliolopez (talk) 20:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 20:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 20:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is a mission statement, not an article. Nate • (chatter) 22:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. And they can tell whoever runs these things I'm not impressed by the gaming of autoconfirm here. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A non-notable startup company. They don't even have a product, vague claim that they will develop something in the future. Spleodrach (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete As above, none of the reference meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 16:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.