Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Has Got a Date, Date, Date, Date, Date

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Family Guy (season 15). Kurykh (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Has Got a Date, Date, Date, Date, Date (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to demonstrate the notability of the subject: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The one source that is cited contains a brief overview of the season rather than providing coverage of the episode about which the article is written. Eddie Blick (talk) 23:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: There are articles for almost all Family Guy episodes, but if there's not enough coverage to justify a standalone article, just redirect. There is no reason to delete a page that is a possible search term. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was asked about my response on my talk page, so I'd like to rephrase. What I mean to say is that this redirect serves a purpose by directing readers to Family Guy (season 15). We shouldn't delete this page, which is helpful to the encyclopedia, but just redirect and avoid wasting editors' time by extending this discussion for too long. I hope this clarifies my thoughts a bit, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.