Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Dust
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:33, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delta Dust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does NOT need article of its own Wayne Jayes (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Negligible content. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC).
- Delete. Non-notable product with no significant topic coverage found in reliable third-party sources. Can be mentioned in the Bayer article, if appropriate. Philg88 ♦talk 05:00, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable, no real saveable content, other than a quick mention. In addition to the Bayer article, maybe also in Deltamethrin, along with other example products which use it as an active ingredient? AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 21:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.