Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawk (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hawk (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable--no record deal AFAIK, no hits, no fame, no fortune. Drmies (talk) 20:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable, cannot find any sources at all. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. Band is only known because of its association/lineage to more popular bands. — WylieCoyote (talk) 03:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete. Per above deletes.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.