Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IrAero Flight 103
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- IrAero Flight 103 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of notability, just another overrun with no fatalities and no long term changes in procedures law, regulations etc. Petebutt (talk) 20:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 6. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 20:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Indeed, there is no evidence for the "lasting significance" that is required to pass WP:EVENT.--FoxyOrange (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable accident. Fails WP:Event....William 19:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents. Scary to say, but plane crashes without fatalities are quite common. While the aircraft may have been wrecked, there was no loss of human life and no changes to procedures. Bearian (talk) 22:35, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.