Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeevanvidya Mission

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeevanvidya Mission

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spiritual movement from India, article with promotional issues that most likely fails WP:GNG. Received a trivial mention in India Today Magazine (used as an inline reference in the article itself). The other inline reference links to a (dead) geocities site. The only other coverage in a reliable source I could find is in a short Economic Times article. Ealuscerwen (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ealuscerwen (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Ealuscerwen (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Ealuscerwen (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Ealuscerwen (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ealuscerwen (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eternal Shadow Talk 00:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no assertion of notability Spiderone 19:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

::Mind that this could probably have been WP:SOFTDELETED, but WP:ASSERTN is not a valid argument, and if it were the case then this would be a situation for speedy deletion and not AfD, though there is currently an assertion of notability in that "It is one of the many spiritual movements in India"... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)sock of banned user. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As a massive failure of WP:BEFORE. Searching for "jeevanvidya mission" on google news yields 1 (Economic Times); 2 (about the death of the founder, but still mentioning the org.; Zee News); 3 (DNAIndia, which is the same org as Zee News, but still independent from article subject). GNG met, easy keep. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)sock of banned user. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 01:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability. Need more independent reliable resources. DMySon 03:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.