Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KXRZ-FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 02:09, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

KXRZ-FM

Advertising. Obviously. KC. 00:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain - what's the rules for radio stations? Do they have to have a certain popularity? How high does it have to be? The article looks okay advertising wise. I know that Triple J radio's article stays up, and is written in much the same way. But then again Triple J has an audience in the millions. Zordrac (talk)
- Triple J is world famous, not least for Live At The Wireless. --kingboyk 05:15, 21 December 2005 (UTC) (UK)[reply]

Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 00:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

keep. mikka (t) 00:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've seen lots of radio station articles around with this title format. You're right, though, it is advertising, so it needs to be rewritten. JHMM13 (T | C) 00:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Deletion is for articles that do not belong on Wikipedia in any form. Radio and television stations are notable; an encyclopedia of U.S. radio stations would include an entry on KXRZ-FM. It just needs a clean-up to remove irrelevant content (which is an easier process than nominating an article for deletion). Davodd 00:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. -- JJay 02:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for reasons stated. Calsicol 04:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Davodd is exactly right. ×Meegs 07:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. If anyone thinks the article is too ad-like, be bold and revise it. 23skidoo 12:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep plenty of other radio station articles out there with similar content. I agree with the cleanup tag. --MisterHand 15:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
<I'm gonna go for Merge - unless a rewrite can be done to make it less of an advert. As it stands, I don't think it's of wikipedic value. 9cds 17:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to where? Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 17:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My initial thought are List of American radio networks 9cds 17:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That merge would create a factual error. The station's parent company would be a better choice, if a merge is used. - Davodd 09:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for all the reasons stated above. -- DS1953 ^talk 19:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I dunno, it seems strange to me that a radio station is an automatic keep but a school isn't. (No vote). --kingboyk 05:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.