Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai von Klitzing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 00:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kai von Klitzing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG. Note that most of the references cited are authored (or co-authored) by the article subject. Deletion requested by article subject (OTRS Ticket#2020052910006438).Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Much as it might amuse me to thwart the wishes of someone who was the subject of undisclosed paid editing, I think the case for WP:PROF#C1 and other related notability criteria is borderline enough that we can apply WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. And WP:CSD#G5 might be relevant as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.