Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Cop on Le Rocks
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect all.. causa sui (talk) 18:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Le Cop on Le Rocks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced; contested PROD. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete This creator has created a ton of episode/short pages, all with the same sources (not reliable, either blogs, or the dvd commentary). The individual shorts/eps are clearly not notable (imo). I did several google searches, and could not find refs that were not refering to the entire series. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I am adding the following similar episode/short pages created by User:Mariannan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) in the past 2+ months:
- Vitamin Pink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Crow De Guerre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Scratch a Tiger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Sicque! Sicque! Sicque! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Le Bowser Bagger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Sweet and Sourdough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Roland and Rattfink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mumbo Jumbo (The Ant And The Aardvark) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Ape Suzette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Sink Pink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Bomb Voyage (The Inspector) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Ants in the Pantry (The Ant and the Aardvark) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- The Ant From Uncle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Pinkologist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Pink Pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Isle of Caprice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Never Bug an Ant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Don't Hustle an Ant with Muscle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Technology, Phooey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Le Quiet Squad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 00:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect all to The Ant and the Aardvark or The Inspector as appropriate. I would suggest merging to "List of ________ episodes" but neither series seems to have such a page yet, so redirect to the series pages. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I could certainly live with redirecting them all. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 00:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- comment creator has continued to remove AFD templates from the linked pages, after being warned multiple times. I have reverted some of them as vandalism, and reported her to aiv. Gaijin42 (talk) 13:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect all as per The Bushranger. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- more articles there are a lot more articles from the Pink Panther series that fall in with this. 124 eps, each with a plot summary, all using the same 3 refs, most of them including the identical text on "laugh track". Here is a subset of them. Im conflicted on these, (slightly, mostly leaning delete). Pink panther is much more notable than the series(s) we have been talking about so far, as those others are essentially spin-offs. They have more editors, vs just maryane. However, the fact that they all use the same 3 refs, and have the same laugh track note really indicates to me that it is group notability, and not individual notability. I think the list/main article can be expanded with a 2-3 line summary for each episode, rather than a whole article for each episode, since there will likely not be more content on a per episode basis really.
I did not subst:afd all these articles, I want to see what others think before going through that. That may mean extending this AFD to give them a fair shake if we do add them in. Supermarket_Pink, Psst_Pink, Pink Pest Control, Pink Campaign, The Pink Phink, Yankee Doodle Pink, Dune Bug (Aardvark entry
Gaijin42 (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect all to The Ant and the Aardvark or The Inspector as none of these cartoons are notable by themselves. --Madison-chan (talk) 02:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect All to either of the two listed by Madison, as none of these cartoons/episodes are notable alone. Jab843 (talk) 17:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Retain I think the Pink Panther articles should be retained, but they also need to be expanded upon. At present, a great many have just the basics and are stub articles. All the other series' (Inspector, Ant and Aardvark, Misterjaw) do not need their individual entries, as they are far less notable.Tomatosoup97 (talk) 16:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.