Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loh Tick Boon
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 04:36, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Loh Tick Boon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was marked as speedy but I declined to speedily delete it under A7 as it does contain a claim of significance for the subject ("...first Silver Award winner for Defence Science at the Tan Kah Kee Young Inventors' Award...").
However, I would none-the-less expect a snow deletion for notability for a biography. The award received is not well-known or significant and I do not expect there will be any substantial depth of coverage in any given source. RA (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, award doesn't seem significant, not otherwise notable per WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 08:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The lack of sources for the award gives credence that it is non-notable. --Ifnord (talk) 01:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.