Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nieobjęta ziemia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nieobjęta ziemia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 14:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 15:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to author. One line article about a none notable book. Suggest redirecting to author. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED . No references used. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies criteria 5 of the guideline WP:NBOOK. The author, Czesław Miłosz, won a nobel prize for literature (and other important awards). James500 (talk) 21:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So? He didn't win it for that specific book. Also the article content provides no added value to the reader that a redirect couldn't suffice. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 22:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

have a read of nbook no. 5 ie. "5.The book's author is so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable." so this work does not necessarily to have won it if the author is deemed to meet this criteria. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines also states "This is not an absolute guarantee that there will necessarily be a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to that book. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article." --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and therfore we go to the article's talkpage that has a discussion about possibly merging this article ... oh, wait, there isn't one. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now there is. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:39, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:NBOOK, reflected in the article by our colleagues over at the Polish WP, or as there are reviews for the english translation, Unattainable Earth in LA Times, and New York Times we could have a redirect/rename to an English titled article. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.