Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Gosh (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Omar Gosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article on Omar Gosh should be considered for deletion as it appears to fall short of Wikipedia's notability standards for biographies of living persons. While Omar Gosh is recognized as a YouTube personality, the article lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources that provide in-depth analysis beyond passing mentions. The content primarily relies on self-published or primary sources, which do not adequately establish the subject's notability as required by Wikipedia's guidelines. Given the insufficient evidence of widespread recognition or influence, the article does not meet the criteria for a standalone entry and should be considered for deletion. Mjbmr (talk) 17:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet, United States of America, and Florida. Mjbmr (talk) 17:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Well, the last AfD had three sources listed as significant, but they seem to be local in nature and more like human interest stories than anything extensive, I don't consider them terribly helpful. I can't find anything since these were published, so I don't see enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I see a lot of the "influencer"-type sources (youtube, tiktok, etc etc) but nothing independent and nothing substantial. There are some interviews, but no real bios. Lamona (talk) 02:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mjbmr wants to take back his nomination; see here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mjbmr, if you wish to withdraw your nomination, please state that underneath your nomination statement.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.