Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rage quit
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to multiplayer video game. MBisanz talk 08:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rage quit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. Ironholds (talk) 23:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge w/ redirect to multiplayer video game; term is used in press, but has little else beyond its meaning to need an article. --MASEM (t) 02:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge w/ redirect To multiplayer video game I agree- it's a term that is often used and should be mentioned, but not worth a whole page. Twinwarrior (talk) 03:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'd agree this is a neologism, but I don't agree with merging it, because under the WP:NEO guidelines, the term shouldn't have its own article, and it shouldn't be used in other articles. Matt (talk) 08:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, technically , 4X is a neologism, but look at the state of that article. "Rage quit" will likely never have enough info to contribution to a full article, but a one sentence about people quitting out of MP games prematurely due to their anger is completely appropriate to state. (it can be sourced). --MASEM (t) 23:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as a neologism. -- Whpq (talk) 11:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge w/ redirect per above. MLauba (talk) 11:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.