Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ria Antoniou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Absent any opposition to the previous two keep assertions. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 03:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ria Antoniou

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Antoniou has never won a national or international beauty pageant at a level that would make her notable. Her modeling roles are not substantial enough to pass notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If found to not be independently notable, redirect to Miss Earth 2008 as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:44, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 03:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject meets the WP:GNG with lots of sources such as this in-depth and this in-depth.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.