Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukphonebook.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per discussion. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ukphonebook.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Not edited in 2 years prior to today, originally created as promotional content 7 years ago. Nordic Dragon 14:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 14:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 14:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 14:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:WEBSITE. Only source I could find is [1], and it's not exactly suitable. — crh ₂₃ (Talk) 16:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not seem to have significant coverage in reliable sources. Google results are mostly just link repositories. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches are simply finding nothing noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.