Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's March on Portland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus that there is both sufficient referencing and scope for the article to be retained (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 23:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women's March on Portland

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero long-term impact. Low participation. Fails WP:GEOSCOPE and WP:SUSTAINED. The Seattle article was kept after an AfD because a lot of people participated in the Seattle one. wumbolo ^^^ 10:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:51, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:51, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Of course, keep this article about one of the largest public protests in Oregon's history, per GNG. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:16, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, historically notable. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's March on Seattle for a similar AfD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Existing sourcing is adequate to establish notability. XOR'easter (talk) 17:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 17:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Historically important march for city of Portland. Unclear how a statement like "zero long-term impact" can be made with any credibility, or that 100,000 participants is considered "low attendance." Netherzone (talk) 21:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "easily one of the largest marches ever in Portland" per the Portland Police Bureau. 24 references. Easy decision. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it already includes enough references to establish notability. Aoba47 (talk) 05:47, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.