Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DannyEddy20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DannyEddy20

DannyEddy20 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

25 June 2024[edit]

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Several recently-created accounts have appeared attempting to create an article about a blockchain company, Concordium. While DannyEddy20 and Cryptobefti have expressly denied ([1], [2]) being socks, the proximity of the creation time of the account and the subject matter of all three four seems more than coincidental. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added another account (WikiJhey) on 29 June 2024. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also added MrViktorgr who might be the actual master account, as it is the oldest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added Richweller10 who was already blocked for spam. See initial user talk page edits. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Bbb23, Drm310, I can't prove anything for any of these accounts, sorry. They're all from known sock farm ranges, sure, but I can't place blocks on technical grounds. On the bright side, they're so incredibly blatantly COI/spammy that they've already made the case for a block themselves, no? Drmies (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed Drmies, I would endorse blocks for spam on all. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/DannyEddy20&oldid=1232629275"